Invasive opportunistic fungal infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality in children and adolescents with cancer or haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Difficulties in establishing the diagnosis continue to delay antifungal therapy, and this has been shown to adversely impact on survival. Apart from ongoing attempts to improve early recognition, effective chemoprophylaxis of invasive fungal infections remains a goal of high priority in populations with disease-related incidence rates of 10% or higher. These include patients with acute myeloid leukaemia, high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemias, recurrent leukaemias and those following allogeneic HSCT. Incidence rates in other paediatric cancer entities, including autologous HSCT, are considerably lower and do not justify the general implementation of antifungal prophylaxis. The difficulties in obtaining a timely diagnosis, the consequences of infectious morbidity on delaying anticancer treatment, and mortality rates >20% and >50% for invasive yeast and mould infections, respectively, provide a clear rationale for antifungal prophylaxis in high-risk populations. However, while antifungal prophylaxis has become part of infectious disease supportive care algorithms in most paediatric leukaemia and allogeneic transplantation programmes, antifungal prophylaxis remains a topic of controversy, with no clear consensus amongst different centres and groups. This is largely based on the limited paediatric data, with only a small number of meaningful studies, and on the fact that the scientific evidence for the benefit of antifungal prophylaxis has been generated exclusively by prospective, randomized, clinical phase III trials conducted in adults with comparable, but not similar conditions. In this article, we briefly review the epidemiology of invasive fungal infections in children and adolescents with cancer and following HSCT; delineate regulatory principles of paediatric drug development with relevant examples for their successful implementation with new antifungal compounds; provide information on the pharmacology and paediatric development of current antifungal compounds; discuss for each compound the evidence for effectiveness as primary or secondary antifungal prophylaxis in adults and the pertinent data published in paediatric patients; and conclude by providing practical options for prophylaxis in children and adolescents with haematological malignancies and following allogeneic HSCT.

Antifungal chemoprophylaxis in children and adolescents with haematological malignancies and following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: review of the literature and options for clinical practice.

Systemic antifungal prophylaxis after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a meta-analysis.

Introduction: Invasive fungal infection (IFI) is a serious problem due to difficulties in early diagnosis and high mortality. Different approaches are adopted for the treatment and management of IFI, including prophylactic, empiric, preemptive and directed strategies. Areas covered: This paper reviews the type of pharmacotherapy used for antifungal prophylaxis in infants with extremely low birth weights, pediatric patients with cardiac disease, preterm neonates, pediatric oncology patients, adult cancer patients with neutropenia, adult patients with hematologic malignancy, hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation recipients, organ transplant recipients, HIV-infected patients, immunosuppressed patients treated with moderate or high doses of corticosteroids, and patients with invasive fusariosis, candidemia, invasive candidiasis, systemic mycoses and immunocompromised patients. Expert opinion: Azole drugs are the drugs most often used in cost-effective antifungal prophylaxis of patients with conditions such ...

Pharmacotherapy approaches to antifungal prophylaxis

Purpose of review Invasive fungal disease (IFD) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. In contrast to adults, detailed information of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of many antifungal compounds is lacking in pediatric patients, and antifungal agents that have been proven to be effective in adults have not been licensed for children. We therefore review the current literature on drugs and dosing for antifungal prophylaxis in the pediatric age group. Recent findings Although there are only few compounds approved for antifungal prophylaxis in children, an increasing number of reports describe safety and suggest efficacy of agents given to prevent IFD in the pediatric population. Owing to the small number of children included in most studies, however, evidence for efficacy has to be extrapolated from studies in adults. In addition, most studies do not address the optimal dosage of a compound to prevent IFD (optimal balance between efficacy and toxicity). Summary Although there is a wide use of prophylactic antifungal agents in children, future studies need to establish the optimal dosing of each compound.

Antifungal prophylaxis in pediatric patients undergoing therapy for cancer: drugs and dosing.

Background Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) carries risks of infectious morbidity. We analysed epidemiology and management burden associated with invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) in children and adolescents undergoing autologous HSCT. Methods In a retrospective, single-centre observational study, epidemiology and management burden associated with IFDs were analysed in all paediatric cancer patients who underwent autologous HSCT between 2005 and 2014. Clinical, radiographic and microbiological data were assessed up to 100 days post-transplant. The primary endpoint was the incidence of proven, probable and possible IFDs. Further endpoints included the use of systemic antifungal agents for prevention and management of IFDs; infectious and non-infectious comorbidities; and survival until day + 100. Results Of 95 patients (median age: 8 years; r, 0.75-20) underwent 103 HSCT procedures for solid tumours (92) or lymphoma (11). Primary antifungal prophylaxis was administered in 49 procedures (47.5%). No single case of proven/probable IFD was diagnosed. Nine cases (8.7%) fulfilled criteria of possible pulmonary mould infection and received treatment for a median of 14 days (r, 7-35). In an additional 12 procedures, empiric antifungal therapy with mould active agents was given for a median of 8 days (r, 3-105). Microbiologically documented non-fungal infections were observed in 17 procedures, and five patients were transferred to the ICU. There was one death from biopsy documented toxic endothelial damage at day 83 post-transplant. Conclusions Autologous HSCT for solid tumours or lymphoma was associated with low morbidity from IFDs. However, utilisation of systemic antifungal agents for prevention and management of suspected IFDs was considerable.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/myc.12968

Epidemiology and management burden of invasive fungal infections after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: 10-year experience at a European Pediatric Cancer Center.

Purpose: The risk of invasive fungal infection is greater for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) than for autologous transplantation. Therefore, many transplantation centers use antifungal prophylaxis for allogeneic HSCT, however, there exists no standard guidelines or consensus regarding autologous HSCT. Materials and Methods: A prospective double-blind randomized study was conducted in autologous HSCT recipients who were divided into prophylaxis and empirical treatment groups, and we investigated the efficacy of itra conazole prophylaxis in pediatric autologous HSCT. Results: Total 87 autologous HSCT episodes in 55 children with high-risk solid tumors were studied. No invasive fungal infections occurred in either group. However, patients in the prophylaxis group had a significantly shorter duration of fever ( p < 0.05) and received antibacterial treatment of shorter duration (p < 0.05) with fewer numbers of antibiotics (p < 0.05 for the use of second line antibiotics) than those in the empirical group. No significant additional adverse events were found with itraconazole prophylaxis. Conclusion: Although beneficial effects such as a shorter duration of fever and reduced need for antibiotic use were observed in the prophylaxis group, the results were not sufficient to draw a definite recommendation about the routine use of antifungal prophylaxis in pediatric autologous HSCT recipients with highrisk solid tumors (Trial registration: NCT00336531).

/pdf/efficacy-of-itraconazole-prophylaxis-for-autologous-stem-11shq5pzrz.pdf

Efficacy of Itraconazole Prophylaxis for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Children with High-Risk Solid Tumors: A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Study

Hye Sook Hwang

Papers

Efficacy of Itraconazole Prophylaxis for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Children with High-Risk Solid Tumors: A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Study