scispace - formally typeset
I

Ian Johnston

Researcher at University of Sydney

Publications -  17
Citations -  391

Ian Johnston is an academic researcher from University of Sydney. The author has contributed to research in topics: Physics education & Force Concept Inventory. The author has an hindex of 8, co-authored 17 publications receiving 358 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Development and Use of a Conceptual Survey in Introductory Quantum Physics.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors constructed a valid and reliable multiple-choice conceptual survey to investigate students' understanding of introductory quantum physics concepts, which was administered to 312 students at the University of Sydney.
Journal ArticleDOI

Use of interactive lecture demonstrations: A ten year study

TL;DR: The Interactive Lecture Demonstration (ILD) is designed for large lecture classes and, if measured using specific conceptual surveys, is purported to provide learning gains of up to 80% as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Developing, Evaluating and Demonstrating the Use of a Conceptual Survey in Mechanical Waves

TL;DR: The Mechanical Wave Conceptual Survey (MWCS) as discussed by the authors was developed to diagnose the students' conceptions of the basic concepts of mechanical wave concepts using the open-ended Wave Diagnostic Test (WDT).
Journal ArticleDOI

Consistency of students' conceptions of wave propagation: Findings from a conceptual survey in mechanical waves

TL;DR: Tongchai et al. as mentioned in this paper developed a multiple-choice conceptual survey in mechanical waves and found that students were committed to these conceptual models, as evidenced by the consistency with which they answered the questions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Developing specialized guided worksheets for active learning in physics lectures

TL;DR: In this article, the authors describe the design of the specialized guided worksheets for the topic of electric field, and its evaluation, and their results indicate that the specialized guides made a difference in topics that students find challenging, but there were issues around certain topics which students found challenging.