scispace - formally typeset
J

J. E. Tarlton

Researcher at University of Oxford

Publications -  8
Citations -  780

J. E. Tarlton is an academic researcher from University of Oxford. The author has contributed to research in topics: Hyperfine structure & Atomic clock. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 7 publications receiving 692 citations. Previous affiliations of J. E. Tarlton include Imperial College London.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Supernova SN 2011fe from an exploding carbon–oxygen white dwarf star

TL;DR: Early observations of type Ia supernova SN 2011fe in the galaxy M101 at a distance from Earth of 6.4 megaparsecs find that the exploding star was probably a carbon–oxygen white dwarf, and from the lack of an early shock it is concluded that the companion was likely a main-sequence star.
Journal ArticleDOI

High-Fidelity Trapped-Ion Quantum Logic Using Near-Field Microwaves

TL;DR: A dynamically decoupled gate method, which stabilizes the qubits against fluctuating energy shifts and avoids the need to null the microwave field, is introduced and used to produce a Bell state with fidelity 99.7(1)%, after accounting for state preparation and measurement errors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Magnetic field stabilization system for atomic physics experiments.

TL;DR: This work demonstrates the stabilization of a field of 14.6 mT to 4.3 nT rms noise using a field-dependent hyperfine transition in a single 43Ca+ ion held in a Paul trap at the center of the magnetic field coils.
Journal ArticleDOI

Magnetic field stabilization system for atomic physics experiments

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors demonstrate stabilization of a field of 14.6 mT to 4.3 nT rms noise (0.29 ppm) using a field-dependent hyperfine transition in a single ion held in a Paul trap at the centre of the magnetic field coils.
Journal ArticleDOI

Probing qubit memory errors at the part-per-million level

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors measured the memory error for a trapped-ion qubit in the small-error regime and found that it was 1.2(7)-times smaller than that extrapolated from the randomized benchmarking, and limited by instability of the atomic clock reference.