J
James R. Barth
Researcher at Auburn University
Publications - 252
Citations - 13751
James R. Barth is an academic researcher from Auburn University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Bank regulation & Deposit insurance. The author has an hindex of 44, co-authored 245 publications receiving 12916 citations. Previous affiliations of James R. Barth include University of Alabama & Federal Home Loan Bank Board.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Industrial banks: Challenging the traditional separation of commerce and banking
James R. Barth,Yanfei Sun +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine the evolving role of regulation designed to prevent non-financial firms from owning banks and demonstrate the performance and regulation of IBs over time challenge the justification and necessity of such a separation.
Journal ArticleDOI
How Does a Borrower's Education Influence Demand for Peer-to-Peer Funding? New Evidence from China
TL;DR: In this paper, the role of the level of education of a borrower on the demand for funding was investigated for P2P lending in China, and it was shown that individuals with higher levels of education demand smaller loans for any given interest rate and lower interest rates for a given loan amount, controlling for a variety of factors.
Posted Content
Bank Regulation and Supervision in 180 Countries from 1999 to 2011
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide new data and measures of bank regulatory and supervisory policies in 180 countries from 1999 to 2011, including information on permissible bank activities, capital requirements, the powers of official supervisory agencies, information disclosure requirements, external governance mechanisms, deposit insurance, barriers to entry, and loan provisioning.
Journal ArticleDOI
Opportunity zones: Do tax benefits go to the most distressed communities?
TL;DR: The authors examined whether state governors selected the most distressed communities, or those with the highest proportions of minorities, as Opportunity Zones (OZs), and compared the distressed communities chosen as OZs in states throughout the country to an equal number of those eligible distressed communities but not selected.