J
James R. Bettman
Researcher at Duke University
Publications - 153
Citations - 32928
James R. Bettman is an academic researcher from Duke University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Information processing & Consumer behaviour. The author has an hindex of 61, co-authored 151 publications receiving 31312 citations. Previous affiliations of James R. Bettman include Saint Petersburg State University & University of California, Los Angeles.
Papers
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
Walking with the scarecrow: The information-processing approach to decision research.
John W. Payne,James R. Bettman +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors take their title from the classic tale of the Wizard of Oz (Baum, 1903), in which the Tin Man seeks a heart, the Lion courage, and the Scarecrow a brain.
Journal ArticleDOI
Issues in Designing Consumer Information Environments
TL;DR: In this paper, results of information processing research of particular importance for designing consumer information environments are reviewed and used in analyzing a proposal for provision of nutritional information by the Federal Trade Commission.
Journal ArticleDOI
Constructive Processes in Consumer Choice
James R. Bettman,Michel A. Zins +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the degree to which consumers use rules or heuristics which have already been developed and stored in memory versus the degree consumers construct the rules they use on the spot, during the actual course of alternative selection, is examined.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Impact of accuracy and effort feedback and goals on adaptive decision behavior
TL;DR: The impact of accuracy feedback, effort feedback, and emphasis on either a goal of maximizing accuracy relative to effort or minimizing effort relative to accuracy on decision processes was found to be consistent with the shift in strategies predicted by an effort/accuracy model of strategy selection.
Journal ArticleDOI
Unstuck from the concrete: Carryover effects of abstract mindsets in intertemporal preferences
TL;DR: This article examined the psychological underpinnings of present-biased preferences by conceptualizing timing decisions as part of a series of judgments and found that shifts in the abstractness of processing triggered by aspects of an earlier (related or unrelated) decision systematically influence the degree of present bias in subsequent decisions.