scispace - formally typeset
J

James W. Tanaka

Researcher at University of Victoria

Publications -  156
Citations -  17283

James W. Tanaka is an academic researcher from University of Victoria. The author has contributed to research in topics: Face perception & Categorization. The author has an hindex of 53, co-authored 150 publications receiving 15641 citations. Previous affiliations of James W. Tanaka include University of Oregon & Oberlin College.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A Reciprocal Model of Face Recognition and Autistic Traits: Evidence from an Individual Differences Perspective

TL;DR: It is suggested that the broader autism phenotype is associated with lower face recognition abilities, even among typically developing individuals.
Journal ArticleDOI

Typicality effects in face and object perception: further evidence for the attractor field model.

TL;DR: In this research, typicality effects were extended to the perception of nonface objects and it was found that 50/50 morphs of birds and cars were judged to be more similar to their atypical parents than to their typical parents.
Journal ArticleDOI

Is the loss of diagnosticity of the eye region of the face a common aspect of acquired prosopagnosia

TL;DR: These results complement previously published evidence that the patient PS presents a lack of sensitivity to diagnostic information located on the eyes of familiar faces during individual face recognition tasks and indicate that the impaired processing of the Eyes of faces is a fundamental aspect of acquired prosopagnosia that can arise following damage to different brain localizations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Independent component analysis and clustering improve signal-to-noise ratio for statistical analysis of event-related potentials

TL;DR: By increasing the signal-to-noise ratio in the measured waveforms, the channel pool method demonstrated an enhanced sensitivity to the neurophysiological response to own-face relative to other faces.
Journal ArticleDOI

Time course of visual object categorization: Fastest does not necessarily mean first

TL;DR: The "fastest means first" hypothesis that levels of abstraction that are categorized fastest are processed first in perceptual categorization is tested by contrasting the time course of basic- and subordinate-level categorization of objects in a signal-to-respond experiment.