J
Jason R. Kerrigan
Researcher at University of Virginia
Publications - 144
Citations - 2032
Jason R. Kerrigan is an academic researcher from University of Virginia. The author has contributed to research in topics: Poison control & Rollover. The author has an hindex of 23, co-authored 139 publications receiving 1797 citations. Previous affiliations of Jason R. Kerrigan include James Madison University.
Papers
More filters
Design of a deformable vehicle roof structure for rollover crash testing with a test buck
TL;DR: In this article, the detailed design of a greenhouse structure (roof and pillars), such that when it is loaded in a static roof crush test the force-displacement response mimics that of a modern full-size crossover vehicle was determined.
A new detailed multi-body model of the pedestrian lower extremity: development and preliminary validation
TL;DR: In this article, a mathematical model of the lower extremity was developed, capable of predicting injury risk and simulating the kinetic and kinematic response of the pedestrian lower extremities under vehicle impact loading.
Injuries and Kinematics: Response of the Cervical Spine in Inverted Impacts
TL;DR: These tests suggest that the direction of torso loading, impact velocity, and boundary conditions at the ends of the cervical spine all affect the kinematics during impact as well as the resulting injuries, and should all be taken into account when determining appropriate injury criteria and developing biofidelic ATDs to predict injuries in crash tests.
Journal Article
Experimental and computational investigation of human clavicle response in anterior-posterior bending loading
Costin D. Untaroiu,Sonia Duprey,Jason R. Kerrigan,Zuoping Li,Dipan Bose,Jeffrey Richard Crandall +5 more
Journal ArticleDOI
Traumatic brain injury in pedestrian-vehicle collisions: Convexity and suitability of some functionals used as injury metrics.
David Sanchez-Molina,Carlos Arregui-Dalmases,Juan Velazquez-Ameijide,M. Angelini,Jason R. Kerrigan,Jeffrey Richard Crandall +5 more
TL;DR: A formal and empirical comparison is made, in order to identify general criteria for reasonable injury metrics, and propose a general guideline to avoid ill-proposed injury metrics.