Objectives This multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial assessed the safety and effectiveness of responsive cortical stimulation as an adjunctive therapy for partial onset seizures in adults with medically refractory epilepsy. Methods A total of 191 adults with medically intractable partial epilepsy were implanted with a responsive neurostimulator connected to depth or subdural leads placed at 1 or 2 predetermined seizure foci. The neurostimulator was programmed to detect abnormal electrocorticographic activity. One month after implantation, subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive stimulation in response to detections (treatment) or to receive no stimulation (sham). Efficacy and safety were assessed over a 12-week blinded period and a subsequent 84-week open-label period during which all subjects received responsive stimulation. Results Seizures were significantly reduced in the treatment (-37.9%, n = 97) compared to the sham group (-17.3%, n = 94; p = 0.012) during the blinded period and there was no difference between the treatment and sham groups in adverse events. During the open-label period, the seizure reduction was sustained in the treatment group and seizures were significantly reduced in the sham group when stimulation began. There were significant improvements in overall quality of life (p Conclusions Responsive cortical stimulation reduces the frequency of disabling partial seizures, is associated with improvements in quality of life, and is well-tolerated with no mood or cognitive effects. Responsive stimulation may provide another adjunctive treatment option for adults with medically intractable partial seizures. Classification of evidence This study provides Class I evidence that responsive cortical stimulation is effective in significantly reducing seizure frequency for 12 weeks in adults who have failed 2 or more antiepileptic medication trials, 3 or more seizures per month, and 1 or 2 seizure foci.

Responsive cortical stimulation for the treatment of medically intractable partial epilepsy

Nearly a quarter of patients with seizures have drug-resistant epilepsy. This review examines how this diagnosis should be established and how to recognize pseudoresistance. It explains possible mechanisms of drug-resistant epilepsy and presents treatment strategies.

/pdf/drug-resistant-epilepsy-4fqrkkd7mq.pdf

Drug-Resistant Epilepsy

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has provided remarkable therapeutic benefits for people with a variety of neurological disorders. Despite the uncertainty of the precise mechanisms underlying its efficacy, DBS is clinically effective in improving motor function of essential tremor, Parkinson's disease and primary dystonia and in relieving obsessive-compulsive disorder. Recently, this surgical technique has continued to expand to other numerous neurological diseases with encouraging results. This review highlighted the current and potential future clinical applications of DBS.

/pdf/deep-brain-stimulation-4xbneft0x1.pdf

Deep brain stimulation.

https://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(14)60456-6.pdf

Epilepsy: new advances

The clinical use of deep brain stimulation (DBS) is among the most important advances in the clinical neurosciences in the past two decades. As a surgical tool, DBS can directly measure pathological brain activity and can deliver adjustable stimulation for therapeutic effect in neurological and psychiatric disorders correlated with dysfunctional circuitry. The development of DBS has opened new opportunities to access and interrogate malfunctioning brain circuits and to test the therapeutic potential of regulating the output of these circuits in a broad range of disorders. Despite the success and rapid adoption of DBS, crucial questions remain, including which brain areas should be targeted and in which patients. This Review considers how DBS has facilitated advances in our understanding of how circuit malfunction can lead to brain disorders and outlines the key unmet challenges and future directions in the DBS field. Determining the next steps in DBS science will help to define the future role of this technology in the development of novel therapeutics for the most challenging disorders affecting the human brain. Over the past 20 years, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has transformed the treatment of movement disorders. Now, new therapeutic possibilities for DBS are emerging for other neurological and psychiatric disorders. This Review considers the clinical and scientific advances facilitated by DBS and the crucial questions, challenges and opportunities that face this technology.

/pdf/deep-brain-stimulation-current-challenges-and-future-5cin0ssqno.pdf

Deep brain stimulation: current challenges and future directions

Summary
Purpose: We report a multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial of bilateral stimulation of the anterior nuclei of the thalamus for localization-related epilepsy

Methods:  Participants were adults with medically refractory partial seizures, including secondarily generalized seizures Half received stimulation and half no stimulation during a 3-month blinded phase; then all received unblinded stimulation

Results:  One hundred ten participants were randomized Baseline monthly median seizure frequency was 195 In the last month of the blinded phase the stimulated group had a 29% greater reduction in seizures compared with the control group, as estimated by a generalized estimating equations (GEE) model (p = 0002) Unadjusted median declines at the end of the blinded phase were 145% in the control group and 404% in the stimulated group Complex partial and “most severe” seizures were significantly reduced by stimulation By 2 years, there was a 56% median percent reduction in seizure frequency; 54% of patients had a seizure reduction of at least 50%, and 14 patients were seizure-free for at least 6 months Five deaths occurred and none were from implantation or stimulation No participant had symptomatic hemorrhage or brain infection Two participants had acute, transient stimulation-associated seizures Cognition and mood showed no group differences, but participants in the stimulated group were more likely to report depression or memory problems as adverse events

Discussion:  Bilateral stimulation of the anterior nuclei of the thalamus reduces seizures Benefit persisted for 2 years of study Complication rates were modest Deep brain stimulation of the anterior thalamus is useful for some people with medically refractory partial and secondarily generalized seizures

/pdf/electrical-stimulation-of-the-anterior-nucleus-of-thalamus-4v93q45fg4.pdf

Jeannine Morrone Strupinsky

Papers

Electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of thalamus for treatment of refractory epilepsy