According to Genome Sequencing Project statistics (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/static/gpstat.html), as of Feb 16, 2012, complete gene sequences have become available for 2816 viruses, 1117 prokaryotes, and 36 eukaryotes.1–2 The availability of full genome sequences has greatly facilitated biological research in many fields, and has greatly contributed to the growth of proteomics.

Proteins are important because they are the direct bio-functional molecules in the living organisms. The term “proteomics” was coined from merging “protein” and “genomics” in the 1990s.3–4 As a post-genomic discipline, proteomics encompasses efforts to identify and quantify all the proteins of a proteome, including expression, cellular localization, interactions, post-translational modifications (PTMs), and turnover as a function of time, space and cell type, thus making the full investigation of a proteome more challenging than sequencing a genome. There are possibly 100,000 protein forms encoded by the approximate 20,235 genes of the human genome,5 and determining the explicit function of each form will be a challenge.

The progress of proteomics has been driven by the development of new technologies for peptide/protein separation, mass spectrometry analysis, isotope labeling for quantification, and bioinformatics data analysis. Mass spectrometry has emerged as a core tool for large-scale protein analysis. In the past decade, there has been a rapid advance in the resolution, mass accuracy, sensitivity and scan rate of mass spectrometers used to analyze proteins. In addition, hybrid mass analyzers have been introduced recently (e.g. Linear Ion Trap-Orbitrap series6–7) which have significantly improved proteomic analysis.

“Bottom-up” protein analysis refers to the characterization of proteins by analysis of peptides released from the protein through proteolysis. When bottom-up is performed on a mixture of proteins it is called shotgun proteomics,8–10 a name coined by the Yates lab because of its analogy to shotgun genomic sequencing.11 Shotgun proteomics provides an indirect measurement of proteins through peptides derived from proteolytic digestion of intact proteins. In a typical shotgun proteomics experiment, the peptide mixture is fractionated and subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis. Peptide identification is achieved by comparing the tandem mass spectra derived from peptide fragmentation with theoretical tandem mass spectra generated from in silico digestion of a protein database. Protein inference is accomplished by assigning peptide sequences to proteins. Because peptides can be either uniquely assigned to a single protein or shared by more than one protein, the identified proteins may be further scored and grouped based on their peptides. In contrast, another strategy, termed ‘top-down’ proteomics, is used to characterize intact proteins (Figure 1). The top-down approach has some potential advantages for PTM and protein isoform determination and has achieved notable success. Intact proteins have been measured up to 200 kDa,12 and a large scale study has identified more than 1,000 proteins by multi-dimensional separations from complex samples.13 However, the top-down method has significant limitations compared with shotgun proteomics due to difficulties with protein fractionation, protein ionization and fragmentation in the gas phase. By relying on the analysis of peptides, which are more easily fractionated, ionized and fragmented, shotgun proteomics can be more universally adopted for protein analysis. In fact, a hybrid of bottom-up and top-down methodologies and instrumentation has been introduced as middle-down proteomics.14 Essentially, middle-down proteomics analyzes larger peptide fragments than bottom-up proteomics, minimizing peptide redundancy between proteins. Additionally the large peptide fragments yield similar advantages as top-down proteomics, such as gaining further insight into post-translational modifications, without the analytical challenges of analyzing intact proteins. Shotgun proteomics has become a workhorse for the analysis of proteins and their modifications and will be increasingly combined with top-down methods in the future.



Figure 1

Proteomic strategies: bottom-up vs. top-down vs. middle-down. The bottom-up approach analyzes proteolytic peptides. The top-down method measures the intact proteins. The middle-down strategy analyzes larger peptides resulted from limited digestion or ...



In the past decade shotgun proteomics has been widely used by biologists for many different research experiments, advancing biological discoveries. Some applications include, but are not limited to, proteome profiling, protein quantification, protein modification, and protein-protein interaction. There have been several reviews nicely summarizing mass spectrometry history,15 protein quantification with mass spectrometry,16 its biological applications,5,17–26 and many recent advances in methodology.27–32 In this review, we try to provide a full and updated survey of shotgun proteomics, including the fundamental techniques and applications that laid the foundation along with those developed and greatly improved in the past several years.

Protein Analysis by Shotgun/Bottom-up Proteomics

Currently there are no sufficiently validated biomarkers to aid the evaluation of new tuberculosis vaccine candidates, the improvement of tuberculosis diagnostics or the development of more effective and shorter treatment regimens. To date, the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis or its products has not been able to adequately address these needs. Understanding the interplay between the host immune system and M. tuberculosis may provide a platform for the identification of suitable biomarkers, through both unbiased and targeted hypothesis-driven approaches. Here, we review immunological markers, their relation to M. tuberculosis infection stages and their potential use in the fight against tuberculosis.

Immunological biomarkers of tuberculosis.

https://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(10)60359-5.pdf

Biomarkers and diagnostics for tuberculosis: progress, needs, and translation into practice

http://www.mossmanassociates.com/TB%20Biomarker%20report%20Lancet_2010.pdf

Tuberculosis 4 Biomarkers and diagnostics for tuberculosis: progress, needs, and translation into practice

Tuberculosis (TB) is a major threat to global health, recently exacerbated by the emergence of highly drug-resistant forms of the disease-causing pathogen and synergy with HIV/AIDS. In 2006, the Stop TB Partnership published "The global plan to stop TB: 2006--2015," which set out a vision of halving the prevalence of and mortality caused by the disease by 2015, followed by eliminating the disease as a public health problem by 2050. This vision depends on the development of improved diagnostics, simpler treatment, and more effective vaccination. Recently, active translational research pipelines directed toward each of these goals have been established, but improved understanding of the fundamental biology of this complex disease will prove to be the key to radical advances in TB control.

/pdf/confronting-the-scientific-obstacles-to-global-control-of-1crgm93p67.pdf

Jo Sheldon

Papers

Identification of diagnostic markers for tuberculosis by proteomic fingerprinting of serum

Identification of diagnostic markers for tuberculosis by proteomic fingerprinting of serum. Commentary