A gene, ATM, that is mutated in the autosomal recessive disorder ataxia telangiectasia (AT) was identified by positional cloning on chromosome 11q22-23. AT is characterized by cerebellar degeneration, immunodeficiency, chromosomal instability, cancer predisposition, radiation sensitivity, and cell cycle abnormalities. The disease is genetically heterogeneous, with four complementation groups that have been suspected to represent different genes. ATM, which has a transcript of 12 kilobases, was found to be mutated in AT patients from all complementation groups, indicating that it is probably the sole gene responsible for this disorder. A partial ATM complementary DNA clone of 5.9 kilobases encoded a putative protein that is similar to several yeast and mammalian phosphatidylinositol-3' kinases that are involved in mitogenic signal transduction, meiotic recombination, and cell cycle control. The discovery of ATM should enhance understanding of AT and related syndromes and may allow the identification of AT heterozygotes, who are at increased risk of cancer.

https://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/268/5218/1749.full.pdf

A single ataxia telangiectasia gene with a product similar to pi-3 kinase

Added by telomerase, arrays of TTAGGG repeats specify the ends of human chromosomes. A complex formed by six telomere-specific proteins associates with this sequence and protects chromosome ends. By analogy to other chromosomal protein complexes such as condensin and cohesin, I will refer to this complex as shelterin. Three shelterin subunits, TRF1, TRF2, and POT1 directly recognize TTAGGG repeats. They are interconnected by three additional shelterin proteins, TIN2, TPP1, and Rap1, forming a complex that allows cells to distinguish telomeres from sites of DNA damage. Without the protective activity of shelterin, telomeres are no longer hidden from the DNA damage surveillance and chromosome ends are inappropriately processed by DNA repair pathways. How does shelterin avert these events? The current data argue that shelterin is not a static structural component of the telomere. Instead, shelterin is emerging as a protein complex with DNA remodeling activity that acts together with several associated DNA repair factors to change the structure of the telomeric DNA, thereby protecting chromosome ends. Six shelterin subunits: TRF1, TRF2, TIN2, Rap1, TPP1, and POT1.

/pdf/shelterin-the-protein-complex-that-shapes-and-safeguards-4nn8ijxqxb.pdf

Shelterin: the protein complex that shapes and safeguards human telomeres

Double-strand DNA breaks are common events in eukaryotic cells, and there are two major pathways for repairing them: homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous DNA end joining (NHEJ). The various causes of double-strand breaks (DSBs) result in a diverse chemistry of DNA ends that must be repaired. Across NHEJ evolution, the enzymes of the NHEJ pathway exhibit a remarkable degree of structural tolerance in the range of DNA end substrate configurations upon which they can act. In vertebrate cells, the nuclease, DNA polymerases, and ligase of NHEJ are the most mechanistically flexible and multifunctional enzymes in each of their classes. Unlike repair pathways for more defined lesions, NHEJ repair enzymes act iteratively, act in any order, and can function independently of one another at each of the two DNA ends being joined. NHEJ is critical not only for the repair of pathologic DSBs as in chromosomal translocations, but also for the repair of physiologic DSBs created during variable (diversity) joining [V(D)J] recombination and class switch recombination (CSR). Therefore, patients lacking normal NHEJ are not only sensitive to ionizing radiation (IR), but also severely immunodeficient.

/pdf/the-mechanism-of-double-strand-dna-break-repair-by-the-2f4y3sj9kf.pdf

The Mechanism of Double-Strand DNA Break Repair by the Nonhomologous DNA End-Joining Pathway

During malignant transformation, cancer cells acquire genetic mutations that override the normal mechanisms controlling cellular proliferation. Primary rodent cells are efficiently converted into tumorigenic cells by the coexpression of cooperating oncogenes1,2. However, similar experiments with human cells have consistently failed to yield tumorigenic transformants3,4,5, indicating a fundamental difference in the biology of human and rodent cells. The few reported successes in the creation of human tumour cells have depended on the use of chemical or physical agents to achieve immortalization6, the selection of rare, spontaneously arising immortalized cells7,8,9,10, or the use of an entire viral genome11. We show here that the ectopic expression of the telomerase catalytic subunit (hTERT)12 in combination with two oncogenes (the simian virus 40 large-T oncoprotein and an oncogenic allele of H-ras) results in direct tumorigenic conversion of normal human epithelial and fibroblast cells. These results demonstrate that disruption of the intracellular pathways regulated by large-T, oncogenic ras and telomerase suffices to create a human tumor cell.

Creation of human tumour cells with defined genetic elements

Sirtuins are a conserved family of proteins found in all domains of life. The first known sirtuin, Sir2 (silent information regulator 2) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, from which the family derives its name, regulates ribosomal DNA recombination, gene silencing, DNA repair, chromosomal stability and longevity. Sir2 homologues also modulate lifespan in worms and flies, and may underlie the beneficial effects of caloric restriction, the only regimen that slows aging and extends lifespan of most classes of organism, including mammals. Sirtuins have gained considerable attention for their impact on mammalian physiology, since they may provide novel targets for treating diseases associated with aging and perhaps extend human lifespan. In this review we describe our current understanding of the biological function of the seven mammalian sirtuins, SIRT1-7, and we will also discuss their potential as mediators of caloric restriction and as pharmacological targets to delay and treat human age-related diseases.

/pdf/sirtuins-in-mammals-insights-into-their-biological-function-4n0wwh14ol.pdf

Sirtuins in mammals: insights into their biological function

The integration of transfected plasmid DNA at the telomere of chromosome 13 in an immortalized simian virus 40-transformed human cell line provided the first opportunity to study polymorphism in the number of telomeric repeat sequences on the end of a single chromosome. Three subclones of this cell line were selected for analysis: one with a long telomere on chromosome 13, one with a short telomere, and one with such extreme polymorphism that no distinct band was discernible. Further subcloning demonstrated that telomere polymorphism resulted from both gradual changes and rapid changes that sometimes involved many kilobases. The gradual changes were due to the shortening of telomeres at a rate similar to that reported for telomeres of somatic cells without telomerase, eventually resulting in the loss of nearly all of the telomere. However, telomeres were not generally lost completely, as shown by the absence of polymorphism in the subtelomeric plasmid sequences. Instead, telomeres that were less than a few hundred base pairs in length showed a rapid, highly heterogeneous increase in size. Rapid changes in telomere length also occurred on longer telomeres. The frequency of this type of change in telomere length varied among the subclones and correlated with chromosome fusion. Therefore, the rapid changes in telomere length appeared occasionally to result in the complete loss of telomeric repeat sequences. Rapid changes in telomere length have been associated with telomere loss and chromosome instability in yeast and could be responsible for the high rate of chromosome fusion observed in many human tumor cell lines.

Telomere dynamics in an immortal human cell line.

Telomeres are composed of repetitive G-rich sequence and an abundance of associated proteins that together form a dynamic cap that protects chromosome ends and allows them to be distinguished from deleterious DSBs. Telomere-associated proteins also function to regulate telomerase, the ribonucleoprtotein responsible for addition of the species-specific terminal repeat sequence. Loss of telomere function is an important mechanism for the chromosome instability commonly found in cancer. Dysfunctional telomeres can result either from alterations in the telomere-associated proteins required for end-capping function, or from alterations that promote the gradual or sudden loss of sufficient repeat sequence necessary to maintain proper telomere structure. Regardless of the mechanism, loss of telomere function can result in sister chromatid fusion and prolonged breakage/fusion/bridge (B/F/B) cycles, leading to extensive DNA amplification and large terminal deletions. B/F/B cycles terminate primarily when the unstable chromosome acquires a new telomere, most often by translocation of the ends of other chromosomes, thereby providing a mechanism for transfer of instability from one chromosome to another. Thus, the loss of a single telomere can result in on-going instability, affect multiple chromosomes, and generate many of the types of rearrangements commonly associated with human cancer.

/pdf/telomeres-chromosome-instability-and-cancer-2y9hxrcue8.pdf

Telomeres, chromosome instability and cancer

The ends of chromosomes are composed of a short repeat sequence and associated proteins that together form a cap, called a telomere, that keeps the ends from appearing as double-strand breaks (DSBs) and prevents chromosome fusion. The loss of telomeric repeat sequences or deficiencies in telomeric proteins can result in chromosome fusion and lead to chromosome instability. The similarity between chromosome rearrangements resulting from telomere loss and those found in cancer cells implicates telomere loss as an important mechanism for the chromosome instability contributing to human cancer. Telomere loss in cancer cells can occur through gradual shortening due to insufficient telomerase, the protein that maintains telomeres. However, cancer cells often have a high rate of spontaneous telomere loss despite the expression of telomerase, which has been proposed to result from a combination of oncogene-mediated replication stress and a deficiency in DSB repair in telomeric regions. Chromosome fusion in mammalian cells primarily involves nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), which is the major form of DSB repair. Chromosome fusion initiates chromosome instability involving breakage-fusion-bridge (B/F/B) cycles, in which dicentric chromosomes form bridges and break as the cell attempts to divide, repeating the process in subsequent cell cycles. Fusion between sister chromatids results in large inverted repeats on the end of the chromosome, which amplify further following additional B/F/B cycles. B/F/B cycles continue until the chromosome acquires a new telomere, most often by translocation of the end of another chromosome. The instability is not confined to a chromosome that loses its telomere, because the instability is transferred to the chromosome donating a translocation. Moreover, the amplified regions are unstable and form extrachromosomal DNA that can reintegrate at new locations. Knowledge concerning the factors promoting telomere loss and its consequences is therefore important for understanding chromosome instability in human cancer.

Telomere dysfunction and chromosome instability

Telomeres and chromosome instability.

Spontaneous telomere loss has been proposed as an important mechanism for initiating the chromosome instability commonly found in cancer cells. We have previously shown that spontaneous telomere loss in a human cancer cell line initiates breakage/fusion/bridge (B/F/B) cycles that continue for many cell generations, resulting in DNA amplification and translocations on the chromosome that lost its telomere. We have now extended these studies to determine the effect of the loss of a single telomere on the stability of other chromosomes. Our study showed that telomere acquisition during B/F/B cycles occurred mainly through translocations involving either the nonreciprocal transfer or duplication of the arms of other chromosomes. Telomere acquisition also occurred through small duplications involving the subtelomeric region of the other end of the same chromosome. Although all of these mechanisms stabilized the chromosome that lost its telomere, they differed in their consequences for the stability of the genome as a whole. Telomere acquisition involving nonreciprocal translocations resulted in the loss of a telomere on the donor chromosome, which consequently underwent additional translocations, isochromosome formation, or complete loss. In contrast, telomere acquisition involving duplications stabilized the genome, although the large duplications created substantial allelic imbalances. Thus, the loss of a single telomere can generate a variety of chromosome alterations commonly associated with human cancer, not only on a chromosome that loses its telomere but also on other chromosomes. Factors promoting telomere loss are therefore likely to have an important role in generating the karyotype evolution associated with human cancer.

https://mcr.aacrjournals.org/content/molcanres/3/3/139.full.pdf

John P. Murnane

Papers

Telomere dynamics in an immortal human cell line.

Telomeres, chromosome instability and cancer

Telomere dysfunction and chromosome instability

Telomeres and chromosome instability.

The loss of a single telomere can result in instability of multiple chromosomes in a human tumor cell line.