scispace - formally typeset
J

Joyce Malyn-Smith

Publications -  23
Citations -  1142

Joyce Malyn-Smith is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Computational thinking & Curriculum. The author has an hindex of 8, co-authored 22 publications receiving 799 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Computational thinking for youth in practice

TL;DR: A "use-modify-create" framework is presented, representing three phases of students' cognitive and practical activity in computational thinking, suggesting continued investment in the development of CT-rich learning environments, in educators who can facilitate their use, and in research on the broader value of computational thinking.
Journal Article

A K-6 computational thinking curriculum framework: implications for teacher knowledge

TL;DR: There is a lack of adequate empirical evidence in terms of the effectiveness of the frameworks proposed herein, but it is expected that the knowledge and research base will dramatically increase over the next several years, as more countries around the world add computer science as a separate school subject to their K-6 curriculum.
Journal ArticleDOI

Computational Thinking from a Disciplinary Perspective: Integrating Computational Thinking in K-12 Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education

TL;DR: A recent special issue of the Journal of Science Education and Technology focused on computational thinking (CT) from a disciplinary perspective as discussed by the authors is an overview of recent work in CT integration in K-12 STEM education.
Journal Article

Arguing for computer science in the school curriculum

TL;DR: It is argued computer science is rapidly becoming critical for generating new knowledge, and should be taught as a distinct subject or content area, especially in secondary schools, and also a beneficence matrix to assist curriculum designers is explored.
Journal ArticleDOI

Machine learning for human learners: opportunities, issues, tensions and threats

TL;DR: This article compares deep learning in computers and humans to examine their similarities and differences and concludes with recommendations about machine learning for teachers, students, policymakers, developers and researchers.