scispace - formally typeset
K

Karim C. Abbaspour

Researcher at Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology

Publications -  158
Citations -  15678

Karim C. Abbaspour is an academic researcher from Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Soil and Water Assessment Tool & Water resources. The author has an hindex of 50, co-authored 149 publications receiving 12814 citations. Previous affiliations of Karim C. Abbaspour include Texas A&M University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used the SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) to simulate all related processes affecting water quantity, sediment, and nutrient loads in the Thur River basin, which is a direct tributary to the Rhine.
Journal ArticleDOI

A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe: Calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model

TL;DR: In this article, the authors build and calibrate an integrated hydrological model of Europe using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) program, and discuss issues with data availability, calibration of large-scale distributed models, and outline procedures for model calibration and uncertainty analysis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Estimating Uncertain Flow and Transport Parameters Using a Sequential Uncertainty Fitting Procedure

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe parameter uncertainties using uniform distributions and fit these distributions iteratively within larger absolute intervals such that two criteria are met: (i) bracketing most of the measured data (>90%) within the 95% prediction uncertainty (95PPU) and (ii) obtaining a small ratio (<1) of the average difference between the upper and lower 95PPU and the standard deviation of measured data.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to the Chaohe Basin in China

TL;DR: Five uncertainty analysis procedures for watershed models are compared and if computationally feasible, Bayesian-based approaches are most recommendable because of their solid conceptual basis, but construction and test of the likelihood function requires critical attention.