K
Kate Cahill
Researcher at University of Oxford
Publications - 21
Citations - 7822
Kate Cahill is an academic researcher from University of Oxford. The author has contributed to research in topics: Smoking cessation & Varenicline. The author has an hindex of 19, co-authored 21 publications receiving 7453 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation.
Lindsay F Stead,Rafael Perera,Chris Bullen,David Mant,Jamie Hartmann-Boyce,Kate Cahill,Tim Lancaster +6 more
TL;DR: In this article, the effectiveness of different forms of nicotine replacement therapy (chewing gum, transdermal patches, nasal spray, inhalers and tablets) in achieving abstinence from cigarettes, or a sustained reduction in amount smoked; to determine whether the effect is influenced by the clinical setting in which the smoker is recruited and treated, the dosage and form of the NRT used, or the intensity of additional advice and support offered to the smoker.
Journal ArticleDOI
Antidepressants for smoking cessation
TL;DR: Bupropion and nortriptyline appear to be equally effective and of similar efficacy to NRT, and high quality evidence that bupropion significantly increased long-term cessation when used as the sole pharmacotherapy is found.
Journal ArticleDOI
Pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation: an overview and network meta‐analysis
TL;DR: The outcome for benefit is continuous or prolonged abstinence at least six months from the start of treatment, and the outcome for harms is the incidence of serious adverse events associated with each of the treatments.
Journal ArticleDOI
Nicotine receptor partial agonists for smoking cessation
TL;DR: The main outcome measured was abstinence from smoking at longest follow-up, and the most rigorous definition of abstinence was abstinence, and preferred biochemically validated rates where they were reported.
Journal ArticleDOI
Workplace interventions for smoking cessation
Kate Cahill,Tim Lancaster +1 more
TL;DR: There was strong evidence that interventions directed towards individual smokers increase the likelihood of quitting smoking and there was a lack of evidence that comprehensive programmes reduced the prevalence of smoking.