scispace - formally typeset
K

Kate Cahill

Researcher at University of Oxford

Publications -  21
Citations -  7822

Kate Cahill is an academic researcher from University of Oxford. The author has contributed to research in topics: Smoking cessation & Varenicline. The author has an hindex of 19, co-authored 21 publications receiving 7453 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation.

TL;DR: In this article, the effectiveness of different forms of nicotine replacement therapy (chewing gum, transdermal patches, nasal spray, inhalers and tablets) in achieving abstinence from cigarettes, or a sustained reduction in amount smoked; to determine whether the effect is influenced by the clinical setting in which the smoker is recruited and treated, the dosage and form of the NRT used, or the intensity of additional advice and support offered to the smoker.
Journal ArticleDOI

Antidepressants for smoking cessation

TL;DR: Bupropion and nortriptyline appear to be equally effective and of similar efficacy to NRT, and high quality evidence that bupropion significantly increased long-term cessation when used as the sole pharmacotherapy is found.
Journal ArticleDOI

Pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation: an overview and network meta‐analysis

TL;DR: The outcome for benefit is continuous or prolonged abstinence at least six months from the start of treatment, and the outcome for harms is the incidence of serious adverse events associated with each of the treatments.
Journal ArticleDOI

Nicotine receptor partial agonists for smoking cessation

TL;DR: The main outcome measured was abstinence from smoking at longest follow-up, and the most rigorous definition of abstinence was abstinence, and preferred biochemically validated rates where they were reported.
Journal ArticleDOI

Workplace interventions for smoking cessation

TL;DR: There was strong evidence that interventions directed towards individual smokers increase the likelihood of quitting smoking and there was a lack of evidence that comprehensive programmes reduced the prevalence of smoking.