K
Keith F. Widaman
Researcher at University of California, Riverside
Publications - 259
Citations - 35391
Keith F. Widaman is an academic researcher from University of California, Riverside. The author has contributed to research in topics: Cognition & Medicine. The author has an hindex of 70, co-authored 240 publications receiving 31852 citations. Previous affiliations of Keith F. Widaman include University of California, Berkeley & University of California.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Continuity and change in self-esteem during emerging adulthood.
Joanne M. Chung,Richard W. Robins,Kali H. Trzesniewski,Erik E. Noftle,Brent W. Roberts,Keith F. Widaman +5 more
TL;DR: The findings support the perspective that self-esteem, like other personality characteristics, can change in systematic ways while exhibiting continuity over time.
Journal ArticleDOI
Influence of Family of Origin and Adult Romantic Partners on Romantic Attachment Security
TL;DR: Observational ratings of warmth and sensitivity in family interactions were positively related to similar behaviors by romantic partners and to attachment security, and romantic interactions characterized by high warmth and low hostility at age 25 predicted greater attachment security at 27, after controlling for attachment security.
Journal ArticleDOI
Memory in the aging brain: doubly dissociating the contribution of the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex.
Andrew P. Yonelinas,Keith F. Widaman,Dan M Mungas,Bruce R Reed,Michael W. Weiner,Helena C. Chui +5 more
TL;DR: The results demonstrate that the forms of episodic memory supported by the human hippocampus and entorhinal cortex can be fully dissociated, and indicate that recollection and familiarity reflect neuroanatomically distinct memory processes.
Journal ArticleDOI
Confirmatory and competitive evaluation of alternative gene‐environment interaction hypotheses
TL;DR: A new regression technique is presented which affords direct testing of theory-derived predictions, as well as competitive evaluation of alternative diathesis-stress and differential-susceptibility propositions, using data on the moderating effect of DRD4 with regard to the effect of childcare quality on children's social functioning.
Journal ArticleDOI
Is the Bifactor Model a Better Model or Is It Just Better at Modeling Implausible Responses? Application of Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares to the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale.
TL;DR: Analysis of ds revealed that some, but not all, of the superior fit of the bifactor model is owed to that model's ability to better accommodate implausible and possibly invalid response patterns, and not necessarily because it better accounts for the effects of direction of wording.