K
Kenneth L. Judd
Researcher at Stanford University
Publications - 197
Citations - 16480
Kenneth L. Judd is an academic researcher from Stanford University. The author has contributed to research in topics: General equilibrium theory & Dynamic programming. The author has an hindex of 50, co-authored 197 publications receiving 15931 citations. Previous affiliations of Kenneth L. Judd include Saint Petersburg State University & National Bureau of Economic Research.
Papers
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
Chapter 17 Computationally Intensive Analyses in Economics
TL;DR: The authors discusses the challenges faced by computational researchers and proposes some solutions, and discusses the difficulties faced by them in the field of economics and discusses some solutions to solve these problems, but also proposes new methodological issues.
Journal ArticleDOI
Shape-preserving dynamic programming
Yongyang Cai,Kenneth L. Judd +1 more
TL;DR: This work introduces shape-preserving approximation methods that stabilize value function iteration, and are generally faster than previous stable methods such as piecewise linear interpolation.
Posted Content
The Social Cost of Stochastic and Irreversible Climate Change
TL;DR: In this article, the authors use DSICE, a DSGE extension of the DICE2007 model of William Nordhaus, which incorporates beliefs about the uncertain economic impact of possible climate tipping events and uses empirically plausible parameterizations of Epstein-Zin preferences to represent attitudes towards risk.
Journal ArticleDOI
Equilibrium Existence and Approximation for Incomplete Market Modelswith Substantial Heterogeneity
TL;DR: In this article, an analysis of incomplete market models with finitely but arbitrarily many heterogeneous agents is presented, where the authors establish existence of recursive equilibria for small and large risks and develop a simple but general solution technique which handles many state and choice variables for each agent.
Posted Content
High performance quadrature rules: how numerical integration affects a popular model of product differentiation
TL;DR: In this article, it was shown that polynomial-based rules out-performed Monte Carlo rules both in terms of efficiency and accuracy in the context of product differentiation, where Monte Carlo methods introduce considerable numerical error and instability into the computations.