scispace - formally typeset
K

Kenneth M. Heilman

Researcher at University of Florida

Publications -  712
Citations -  40917

Kenneth M. Heilman is an academic researcher from University of Florida. The author has contributed to research in topics: Neglect & Apraxia. The author has an hindex of 100, co-authored 706 publications receiving 39122 citations. Previous affiliations of Kenneth M. Heilman include Jerusalem Mental Health Center & McKnight Brain Institute.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Mood disturbances and cognitive functioning in Parkinson's disease: the effects of disease duration and side of onset of motor symptoms.

TL;DR: The results indicate that mood problems and disease duration interact to significantly affect cognitive functioning but only for those PD patients who experience a right hemibody onset of symptoms.
Journal ArticleDOI

Neuro-ophthalmic aspects of central nervous system cryptococcosis. Internuclear and supranuclear ophthalmoplegia.

TL;DR: The neuro-ophthalmic manifestations of central nervous system cryptococcosis have been extended to include internuclear and supranuclear ophthalmoplegias and autopsy evidence implies basilar endarteritis with brain stem infarction.
Book ChapterDOI

Emotion and the Brain: A Distributed Modular Network Mediating Emotional Experience

TL;DR: This chapter explores the neural basis of emotional experience by exploring the portions of the brain that process emotional stimuli that appear to be important in mediating arousal response and the left appears to inhibit the arousal response.
Journal ArticleDOI

Verbal learning in Alzheimer's disease: cumulative word knowledge gains across learning trials.

TL;DR: The CWL score might be a more sensitive indicator overall of total learning capacity and may be useful in staging Alzheimer’s disease because of increased resilience to floor effects.
Journal ArticleDOI

The influence of emotional faces on the spatial allocation of attention.

TL;DR: Independent of location, the presence of emotional faces influenced the spatial allocation of attention, such that normal subjects shift the direction of their attention toward left hemispace and this attentional shift appears to be greater for negative (sad) than positive faces (happy).