scispace - formally typeset
K

Klaus Nielsen

Researcher at Canadian Food Inspection Agency

Publications -  106
Citations -  4066

Klaus Nielsen is an academic researcher from Canadian Food Inspection Agency. The author has contributed to research in topics: Immunoassay & Complement fixation test. The author has an hindex of 36, co-authored 106 publications receiving 3837 citations. Previous affiliations of Klaus Nielsen include Nielsen Holdings N.V. & Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Diagnosis of brucellosis by serology.

TL;DR: Serological diagnosis of brucellosis began more than 100 years ago with a simple agglutination test, but this type of test was susceptible to false positive reactions resulting from, for instance, exposure to cross reacting microorganisms, giving rise to the development of primary binding assays.
Journal ArticleDOI

Diagnosis of Brucellosis in Livestock and Wildlife

TL;DR: The diagnosis of brucellosis in livestock and wildlife is complex and serological results need to be carefully analyzed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Review of detection of Brucella spp. by polymerase chain reaction.

TL;DR: A review of most of the currently used polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods for identification of Brucella bacteria in biological samples, focused in particular on methods using single-pair primers, multiplex primer, real-time PCRs, PCRs for marine BrucellA, and PCR for molecular biotyping.
Journal ArticleDOI

Diagnosis of Brucellosis

TL;DR: Brucellosis serology have advanced considerably in the last decades with very sensitive and specific new tests available, from the rapid recognition of genus to differential identification of species and strains.
Journal ArticleDOI

A homogeneous fluorescence polarization assay for detection of antibody to Brucella abortus

TL;DR: A homogeneous fluorescence polarization (FP) assay (FPA) was developed for detection of antibody in bovine sera to Brucella abortus and it became evident that the initial cut-off value was set too high and, using ROC analysis, a cut- off of 90 mP increased the sensitivity to 99.02% while the specificity decreased.