An introduction to heat transfer

Thermophysical Properties Research Literature Retrieval Guide Edited by Y. S. Touloukian, J. K. Gerritsen and N. Y. Moore Second edition, revised and expanded. Book 1: Pp. xxi + 819. Book 2: Pp.621. Book 3: Pp. ix + 1315. (New York: Plenum Press, 1967.) n.p.

/pdf/heat-and-mass-transfer-1yaijfx8vp.pdf

Heat and Mass Transfer

Lean blowoff of bluff body stabilized flames: Scaling and dynamics

Fifty years after the foundation of the Combustion Institute and almost 150 years after Michael Faraday's famous lectures on the combustion of a candle, combustion diagnostics have come a long way from visual inspection of a flame to detailed analysis of a combustion process with a multitude of sophisticated techniques, often using lasers. The extended knowledge on combustion phenomena gained by application of these diagnostic techniques, combined with equally advanced numerical simulation of the process, has been instrumental in designing modern combustion devices with efficient performance and reduced pollutant emission. Also, similar diagnostic techniques are now employed to develop sensors for process control in combustion. This article intends to give a perspective on the potential of combustion diagnostics by highlighting selected application examples and by guiding the reader to recent literature. In particular, techniques are emphasized, which permit measurement of important features of the chemical composition, sometimes in conjunction with flow field parameters. Although a complete image of present research and applications in combustion diagnostics and control is beyond the scope of this article, this overview may be a starting place where ideas may be found to solve specific combustion problems with the aid of diagnostics. (Less)

Combustion at the focus: laser diagnostics and control

Large-eddy simulation of a lifted methane jet flame in a vitiated coflow

Scalar and velocity field measurements in a lifted CH4–air diffusion flame

Simultaneous Rayleigh imaging and CH-PLIF measurements in a lifted jet diffusion flame

Observations on the leading edge in lifted flame stabilization

This paper presents the results of a parametric study concerning the phenomenon of liftoff of a nonpremixed jet flame. The dependence of liftoff height on jet exit velocity and coflow velocity is described. It is shown that lifted flames become less sensitive to jet exit velocity as the stabilization point recedes from the burner exit. The results reveal that in cases of extreme liftoff height, increases in jet exit velocity with a constant coflow cause some ethylene flames to stabilize closer to the burner. The success of current theories on lifted flame stabilization in comparison to the experimental results of this study are assessed. The existence of multiple regimes for flame stabilization, incorporating aspects of both premixed and nonpremixed combustion, is proposed.

Studies on Lifted Jet Flames in Coflow: The Stabilization Mechanism in the Near- and Far-Fields

Joint two-shot CH planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF) and particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements near the stabilization region of lifted methane/air diffusion flames stabilized under different flow conditions are presented. The simultaneous technique allows for a determination of the propagation rate of the CH zone relative to the fuel flow. Simultaneous single-shot CH-PLIF and PIV techniques have been used in the past to examine lifted jet flames: however, the double-shot technique of the current study is desirable because it yields information on flame dynamics—as indicated by sequential CH-PLIF—relative to the unburned mixture. Three flow conditions were examined corresponding to three different liftoff heights. While the average velocity at the stabilization point varies between 0.83 m/s for the lowest flow condition (Red=4800) and 1.28 m/s for the highest (Red=8300), the velocity at the stabilization point during instances of zero CH movement (during the time interval of the CH pulses) is constant for all three flow conditions (1.14±0.4 m/s). Furthermore, the flame is able to stabilize itself against the incoming unburned mixture only when the gas velocity is below a certain limit, above which the flame is convected downstream with the flow.

Kyle A. Watson

Papers

Scalar and velocity field measurements in a lifted CH4–air diffusion flame

Simultaneous Rayleigh imaging and CH-PLIF measurements in a lifted jet diffusion flame

Observations on the leading edge in lifted flame stabilization

Studies on Lifted Jet Flames in Coflow: The Stabilization Mechanism in the Near- and Far-Fields

Simultaneous two-shot CH planar laser-induced fluorescence and particle image velocimetry measurements in lifted CH4/air diffusion flames