Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) were first published by a Task Force of the European Respiratory Society (ERS) in 1998 [1]. In 2005, a completely revised version was produced, this time by a joint Task Force of the ERS and the European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) [2]. They used up-to-date methodology for guideline development, including a transparent and objective systematic literature search strategy, and evidence and recommendation grading [2]. Now, 6 yrs later, a joint Task Force of the two Societies, using the same methodology as in 2005, has produced a further update of these guidelines incorporating publications through to May 2010. The Task Force included an epidemiologist with expertise in guideline methodology and experts in the specialty areas relevant to LRTI management, including general practice, microbiology, infectious diseases, respiratory medicine, intensive care and public health.

A short version of the guidelines containing only the recommendations has now been published in Clinical Microbiology and Infection [3], with more detailed versions available on each Society’s website. The guidelines cover the breadth of adult community-acquired respiratory infection, including prevention (both vaccine- and nonvaccine-related), infections in the community and infections in those admitted to hospital, including pneumonia, exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and exacerbations of bronchiectasis. The …

https://erj.ersjournals.com/content/erj/26/6/1138.full.pdf

Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections

https://www.clinicalmicrobiologyandinfection.com/article/S1198-743X(14)61403-8/pdf

Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections - Summary

Influenza vaccination coverage among healthcare workers (HCW) is insufficient despite health authority recommendations in many countries. Numerous vaccination campaigns encouraging HCW to be vaccinated have met with resistance. We reviewed published influenza vaccination programs in healthcare settings to understand the reasons for their success and failure, as well as the attitudes and beliefs of HCW. Relevant articles published up to June 2004 were identified in the MEDLINE/Pubmed database. Thirty-two studies performed between 1985 and 2002 reported vaccination rates of 2.1–82%. Vaccination campaigns including easy access to free vaccine and an educational program tended to obtain the highest uptake, particularly in the USA. Yet, even this type of campaign was not always successful. Two main barriers to satisfactory vaccine uptake were consistently reported: (1) misperception of influenza, its risks, the role of HCW in its transmission to patients, and the importance and risks of vaccination (2) lack of (or perceived lack of) conveniently available vaccine. To overcome these barriers and increase uptake, vaccination campaigns must be carefully designed and implemented taking account of the specific needs at each healthcare institution.

Influenza vaccination of healthcare workers: a literature review of attitudes and beliefs.

Background
Immunization rates for children and adults are rising, but coverage levels have not reached optimal goals. As a result, vaccine‐preventable diseases still occur. In an era of increasing complexity of immunization schedules, rising expectations about the performance of primary care, and large demands on primary care providers, it is important to understand and promote interventions that work in primary care settings to increase immunization coverage. One common theme across immunization programs in many nations involves the challenge of implementing a population‐based approach and identifying all eligible recipients, for example the children who should receive the measles vaccine. However, this issue is gradually being addressed through the availability of immunization registries and electronic health records. A second common theme is identifying the best strategies to promote high vaccination rates. Three types of strategies have been studied: (1) patient‐oriented interventions, such as patient reminder or recall, (2) provider interventions, and (3) system interventions, such as school laws. One of the most prominent intervention strategies, and perhaps best studied, involves patient reminder or recall systems. This is an update of a previously published review.

/pdf/patient-reminder-and-recall-interventions-to-improve-3ug3aafnfb.pdf

Patient reminder and recall interventions to improve immunization rates

Vaccinating healthcare workers against influenza to protect the vulnerable- : Is it a good use of healthcare resources? A systematic review of the evidence and an economic evaluation

In a randomized controlled trial, an intensive promotional campaign failed to increase the uptake of vaccination against influenza among health care workers. The uptake of vaccination was low.

/pdf/promoting-uptake-of-influenza-vaccination-among-health-care-1h5552tfpq.pdf

Leroy Benons

Papers

Promoting uptake of influenza vaccination among health care workers: a randomized controlled trial

Nosocomial influenza infection.

Caribbean: Measles elimination