Lisa Droogendyk

TL;DR: In this article, the authors consider when such contact may harm rather than help resistance movements by disadvantaged groups and suggest that to avoid these undermining effects, advantaged group allies must effectively communicate support for social change, understand the implications of their own privilege, offer autonomy-oriented support, and resist the urge to increase their own feelings of inclusion by co-opting relevant marginalized social identities.

TL;DR: This paper found that politicized environmental identification is a proximal predictor of environmental activism, which warrants increased attention in theory, research, and interventions aimed at motivating PEB and environmental activism.

TL;DR: Using a large and heterogeneous dataset, Hässler et al. show that intergroup contact and support for social change towards greater equality are positively associated among members of advantaged groups, but negatively associated among disadvantaged groups.

TL;DR: A broad distinction between benevolence and activism serves as the foundation to explore forms of intergroup prosociality, such as charitable giving, displays of empathy and affirmation, allyship, and solidarity as mentioned in this paper.

TL;DR: This paper found that positive cross-group contact in which an advantaged group member explicitly communicates opposition to inequality between groups ("supportive contact") would not undermine collective action and would be empowering for disadvantaged group members.