scispace - formally typeset
M

M. Ramesh

Researcher at National University of Singapore

Publications -  159
Citations -  5779

M. Ramesh is an academic researcher from National University of Singapore. The author has contributed to research in topics: Government & Public policy. The author has an hindex of 29, co-authored 115 publications receiving 4722 citations. Previous affiliations of M. Ramesh include University of Sydney & University of Hong Kong.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Measuring Individual-Level Analytical, Managerial and Political Policy Capacity: A Survey Instrument

TL;DR: In this paper, a framework of policy capacity is proposed to measure not only the levels of individual policy capacity but also the dynamic interactions of the policy actors with resources at the level of the organization and policy system.
Journal ArticleDOI

Health Care Reforms in Developing Asia: Propositions and Realities

TL;DR: The authors conclude that although the axiom that health care is atypical due to pervasive market failures is widely acknowledged by reformers, the scope and depth of the negative consequences of market competition and private sector involvement are systematically underestimated in policy design and implementation.
MonographDOI

Transforming Asian governance : rethinking assumptions, challenging practices

TL;DR: In this article, Fritzen et al. presented a case study of team-based management for good governance in the public health system of Rajasthan, India, focusing on the role of the judiciary in good governance.
Journal ArticleDOI

Social Protection in Indonesia and the Philippines: Work in Progress

TL;DR: In this paper, a comparative review of social protection programs for the poor, aged and sick in Indonesia and the Philippines with the purpose of assessing their performance in effectively protecting the population is presented.
Journal ArticleDOI

Unpacking policy portfolios: primary and secondary aspects of tool use in policy mixes

TL;DR: In this paper, a recent resurgence of interest in policy design has fostered renewed efforts to better understand how specific combinations of policy tools arise and shape policy outcomes, but to date, these efforts are limited.