Altered m6A Modification of Specific Cellular Transcripts Affects Flaviviridae Infection

Summary The RNA modification N6-methyladenosine (m6A) can modulate mRNA fate and thus affect many biological processes. We analyzed m6A modification across the transcriptome following infection by dengue virus (DENV), Zika virus (ZIKV), West Nile virus (WNV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV). We found that infection by these viruses in the Flaviviridae family alters m6A modification of specific cellular transcripts, including RIOK3 and CIRBP. During viral infection, the addition of m6A to RIOK3 promotes its translation, while loss of m6A in CIRBP promotes alternative splicing. Importantly, we found that activation of innate immune sensing or the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response by viral infection contributes to the changes in m6A modification in RIOK3 and CIRBP, respectively. Further, several transcripts with infection-altered m6A profiles, including RIOK3 and CIRBP, encode proteins that influence DENV, ZIKV, and HCV infection. Overall, this work reveals that cellular signaling pathways activated during viral infection lead to alterations in m6A modification of host mRNAs to regulate infection.

https://biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2019/06/13/670984.full-text.pdf

Altered m6A modification of specific cellular transcripts affects Flaviviridae infection

Type I interferons (IFN) initiate an antiviral state through a signal transduction cascade that leads to the induction of hundreds of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) to restrict viral infection. Recently, RNA modifications on both host and viral RNAs have been described as regulators of infection. However, the impact of host mRNA cap modifications on the IFN response and how this regulates viral infection are unknown. Here, we reveal that CMTR1, an ISG that catalyzes 2'-O-methylation of the first transcribed nucleotide in cellular mRNA (Cap 1), promotes the protein expression of specific ISGs that contribute to the antiviral response. Depletion of CMTR1 reduces the IFN-induced protein levels of ISG15, MX1, and IFITM1, without affecting their transcript abundance. However, CMTR1 depletion does not significantly affect the IFN-induced protein or transcript abundance of IFIT1 and IFIT3. Importantly, knockdown of IFIT1, which acts with IFIT3 to inhibit the translation of RNAs lacking Cap 1 2'-O-methylation, restores protein expression of ISG15, MX1, and IFITM1 in cells depleted of CMTR1. Finally, we found that CMTR1 plays a role in restricting RNA virus replication, likely by ensuring the expression of specific antiviral ISGs. Taken together, these data reveal that CMTR1 is required to establish an antiviral state by ensuring the protein expression of a subset of ISGs during the type I IFN response.IMPORTANCE Induction of an efficient type I IFN response is important to control viral infection. We show that the host 2'-O-methyltransferase CMTR1 facilitates the protein expression of ISGs in human cells by preventing IFIT1 from inhibiting the translation of those mRNAs lacking cap 2'-O-methylation. Thus, CMTR1 promotes the IFN-mediated antiviral response.

https://journals.asm.org/doi/pdf/10.1128/mSphere.00202-20

The mRNA Cap 2'-O-Methyltransferase CMTR1 Regulates the Expression of Certain Interferon-Stimulated Genes.

Golgi Apparatus: An Emerging Platform for Innate Immunity

A harmonized balance between positive and negative regulation of pattern recognition receptor (PRR)-initiated immune responses is required to achieve the most favorable outcome for the host. This balance is crucial because it must not only ensure activation of the first line of defense against viral infection but also prevent inappropriate immune activation, which results in autoimmune diseases. Recent studies have shown how signal transduction pathways initiated by PRRs are positively and negatively regulated by diverse modulators to maintain host immune homeostasis. However, viruses have developed strategies to subvert the host antiviral response and establish infection. Viruses have evolved numerous genes encoding immunomodulatory proteins that antagonize the host immune system. This review focuses on the current state of knowledge regarding key host factors that regulate innate immune signaling molecules upon viral infection and discusses evidence showing how specific viral proteins counteract antiviral responses via immunomodulatory strategies. In the initial stages of viral infection, the body relies on innate or non-specific immune signaling pathways to spur antiviral response mechanisms into action, however viruses have evolved to counteract these defense mechanisms. Jong-Soo Lee and colleagues from Chungnam National University in Daejeon, South Korea, review the signaling pathways and regulatory factors involved in these two opposing processes. The researchers detail the different molecular players involved in recognizing DNA or RNA from viruses and highlight the immune-modulating mechanisms by which viruses evade detection. A more complete knowledge of these pathways and their interactions could help drug developers identify new ways of treating or preventing viral infections. It could also provide insights into how autoimmunity and other problems can arise when these antiviral surveillance mechanisms fail to work correctly.

Regulation of antiviral innate immune signaling and viral evasion following viral genome sensing.

The small GTPase RAB1B promotes antiviral innate immunity by interacting with TNF receptor–associated factor 3 (TRAF3)

Nucleic acid-based antiviral innate immunity activates a signaling cascade that induces type I and type III interferons (IFNs), and other cytokines. This signaling, which is highly regulated, is initiated by pattern recognition receptors, such as RIG-I, that sense viral RNA and then signal to the adaptor protein, MAVS. This adaptor protein then recruits additional signaling proteins, including TRAF3 and TBK1, to form a signaling complex that results in IRF3 activation for transcriptional induction of IFN. Here, we show that the GTPase trafficking protein RAB1B positively regulates RIG-I signaling to promote IFN-β induction and the antiviral response. Over-expression of RAB1B increases RIG-I-mediated signaling to IFN-β, while deletion results in reduced signaling of this pathway. Additionally, this loss of RAB1B results in a dampened antiviral response, as Zika virus infection is enhanced in the absence of RAB1B. Importantly, we identified the mechanism of RAB1B action by determining that it interacts with TRAF3 to facilitate the interaction of TRAF3 with MAVS. Thus, we identified RAB1B as a regulator of TRAF3 to promote the formation of innate immune signaling complexes in response to nucleic acid sensing.

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2019/02/05/542050.full.pdf

Madhuvanthi Vijayan

Papers

The small GTPase RAB1B promotes antiviral innate immunity by interacting with TNF receptor–associated factor 3 (TRAF3)

RAB1B interacts with TRAF3 to promote antiviral innate immunity