An Integrated Agent Architecture for Software Defined Radio. Rapid-prototype cognitive radio, CR1, was developed to apply these.The modern software defined radio has been called the heart of a cognitive radio. Cognitive radio: an integrated agent architecture for software defined radio. Http:bwrc.eecs.berkeley.eduResearchMCMACR White paper final1.pdf. The cognitive radio, built on a software-defined radio, assumes. Radio: An Integrated Agent Architecture for Software Defined Radio, Ph.D. The need for software-defined radios is underlined and the most important notions used for such. Mitola III, Cognitive radio: an integrated agent architecture for software defined radio, Ph.D. This results in the set-theoretic ontology of radio knowledge defined in the. Cognitive Radio An Integrated Agent Architecture for Software.This article first briefly reviews the basic concepts about cognitive radio CR. Cognitive Radio-An Integrated Agent Architecture for Software Defined Radio. Cognitive Radio RHMZ 2007. Software-defined radio SDR idea 1. Cognitive radio: An integrated agent architecture for software.Cognitive Radio SOFTWARE DEFINED RADIO, AND ADAPTIVE WIRELESS SYSTEMS2 Cognitive Networks. 3 Joseph Mitola III, Cognitive Radio: An Integrated Agent Architecture for Software Defined Radio Stockholm.

/pdf/cognitive-radio-an-integrated-agent-architecture-for-1v855bviue.pdf

Cognitive Radio An Integrated Agent Architecture for Software Defined Radio

A type system is a syntactic method for automatically checking the absence of certain erroneous behaviors by classifying program phrases according to the kinds of values they compute. The study of type systems -- and of programming languages from a type-theoretic perspective -- has important applications in software engineering, language design, high-performance compilers, and security.This text provides a comprehensive introduction both to type systems in computer science and to the basic theory of programming languages. The approach is pragmatic and operational; each new concept is motivated by programming examples and the more theoretical sections are driven by the needs of implementations. Each chapter is accompanied by numerous exercises and solutions, as well as a running implementation, available via the Web. Dependencies between chapters are explicitly identified, allowing readers to choose a variety of paths through the material.The core topics include the untyped lambda-calculus, simple type systems, type reconstruction, universal and existential polymorphism, subtyping, bounded quantification, recursive types, kinds, and type operators. Extended case studies develop a variety of approaches to modeling the features of object-oriented languages.

https://www.seas.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/tapl/contents.pdf

Types and Programming Languages

From the Publisher:
Standard ML is general-purpose programming language designed for large projects. This book provides a formal definition of Standard ML for the benefit of all concerned with the language, including users and implementers. Because computer programs are increasingly required to withstand rigorous analysis, it is all the more important that the language in which they are written be defined with full rigor. The authors have defined their semantic objects in mathematical notation that is completely independent of Standard ML.

The Definition of Standard ML

In joint work with Peter O'Hearn and others, based on early ideas of Burstall, we have developed an extension of Hoare logic that permits reasoning about low-level imperative programs that use shared mutable data structure. The simple imperative programming language is extended with commands (not expressions) for accessing and modifying shared structures, and for explicit allocation and deallocation of storage. Assertions are extended by introducing a "separating conjunction" that asserts that its subformulas hold for disjoint parts of the heap, and a closely related "separating implication". Coupled with the inductive definition of predicates on abstract data structures, this extension permits the concise and flexible description of structures with controlled sharing. In this paper, we survey the current development of this program logic, including extensions that permit unrestricted address arithmetic, dynamically allocated arrays, and recursive procedures. We also discuss promising future directions.

/pdf/separation-logic-a-logic-for-shared-mutable-data-structures-1oyj7ddi1a.pdf

Separation logic: a logic for shared mutable data structures

Program analysis utilizes static techniques for computing reliable information about the dynamic behavior of programs. Applications include compilers (for code improvement), software validation (for detecting errors) and transformations between data representation (for solving problems such as Y2K). This book is unique in providing an overview of the four major approaches to program analysis: data flow analysis, constraint-based analysis, abstract interpretation, and type and effect systems. The presentation illustrates the extensive similarities between the approaches, helping readers to choose the best one to utilize.

Principles of program analysis

Region Inference is a technique for implementing programming languages that are based on typed call-by-value lambda calculus, such as Standard ML. The mathematical runtime model of region inference uses a stack of regions, each of which can contain an unbounded number of values. This paper is concerned with mapping the mathematical model onto real machines. This is done by composing region inference with Region Representation Inference, which gradually refines region information till it is directly implementable on conventional von Neumann machines. The performance of a new region-based ML compiler is compared to the performance of Standard ML of New Jersey, a state-of-the-art ML compiler.

From region inference to von Neumann machines via region representation inference

Region Inference is a program analysis which infers lifetimes of values. It is targeted at a runtime model in which the store consists of a stack of regions and memory management predominantly consists of pushing and popping regions, rather than performing garbage collection. Region Inference has previously been specified by a set of inference rules which formalize when regions may be allocated and deallocated. This article presents an algorithm which implements the specification. We prove that the algorithm is sound with respect to the region inference rules and that it always terminates even though the region inference rules permit polymorphic recursion in regions. The algorithm is the result of several years of experiments with region inference algorithms in the ML Kit, a compiler from Standard ML to assembly language. We report on practical experience with the algorithm and give hints on how to implement it.

A region inference algorithm

We report on our experience with designing, implementing, proving correct, and evaluating a region-based memory management system.

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1023%2FB%3ALISP.0000029446.78563.a4.pdf

A Retrospective on Region-Based Memory Management

The definition of standard ML, Version 3

Standard ML has a module system that allows one to define parametric modules, called functors. Functors are “first-order,” meaning that functors themselves cannot be passed as parameters or returned as results of functor applications. This paper presents a semantics for a higher-order module system which generalizes the module system of Standard ML. The higher-order functors described here are implemented in the current version of Standard ML of New Jersey and have proved useful in programming practice.

/pdf/a-semantics-for-higher-order-functors-ak5mmvtqro.pdf

Mads Tofte

Papers

From region inference to von Neumann machines via region representation inference

A region inference algorithm

A Retrospective on Region-Based Memory Management

The definition of standard ML, Version 3

A Semantics for Higher-Order Functors