scispace - formally typeset
M

Mark Ashworth

Researcher at King's College London

Publications -  279
Citations -  6537

Mark Ashworth is an academic researcher from King's College London. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Medicine. The author has an hindex of 37, co-authored 245 publications receiving 5284 citations. Previous affiliations of Mark Ashworth include University of Cambridge.

Papers
More filters
Journal Article

Psychological determinants of medication adherence in stroke survivors: a systematic review of observational studies

TL;DR: This review provides foundations for evidence-based intervention design by establishing psychological determinants most influential in stroke survivors’ medication adherence by mapping identified determinants into the Theoretical Domains Framework.
Journal ArticleDOI

Epilepsy and mortality: a retrospective cohort analysis with a nested case-control study identifying causes and risk factors from primary care and linkage-derived data.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used a retrospective cohort study to explore cause of death and a nested case-control study to identify risk factors associated with mortality using primary care population data from 1 April 2004 to 31 March 2014.
Journal ArticleDOI

The role of spoken language in cardiovascular health inequalities: a cross-sectional study of people with non-English language preference.

TL;DR: The non-English language preference group was associated with a greater risk of some aspects of cardiovascular disease than the Englishlanguage preference group, probably reflecting shared cultural and behavioural risk.
Journal Article

The development of prescribing incentive schemes in primary care: a longitudinal survey.

TL;DR: In incentive schemes in London and the South-East NHS Regions in the two consecutive years since 1999, most of the changes to the incentives and prescribing indicators favoured improvements in prescribing quality, rather than cost control.
Journal ArticleDOI

What gets recorded, counts: dementia recording in primary care compared with a specialist database.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined whether people with dementia recorded in a specialist database (from a mental health and dementia care service) differ from those recorded in primary care, and they found that using the specialist database may underrepresent those patients who have more frailty, reflecting differential referral to mental health services, and demonstrating how the patient pathways are an important consideration when undertaking database studies.