M
Mark Dawson
Researcher at Hertie School of Governance
Publications - 63
Citations - 712
Mark Dawson is an academic researcher from Hertie School of Governance. The author has contributed to research in topics: Politics & European union. The author has an hindex of 13, co-authored 58 publications receiving 671 citations. Previous affiliations of Mark Dawson include Maastricht University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Constitutional Balance in the EU after the Euro‐Crisis
Mark Dawson,Floris de Witte +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the European Union's response to the euro-crisis has altered the constitutional balance upon which its stability is based, and it is argued that recent reforms are likely to have a lasting impact on the ability of the EU to mediate conflicting interests in all three areas.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Legal and Political Accountability Structure of ‘Post-Crisis’ EU Economic Governance
TL;DR: This article argued that post-crisis governance departs from the mechanisms of legal and political accountability present in previous forms of EU decision-making without substituting new models of accountability in their place.
Book
New Governance and the Transformation of European Law: Coordinating EU Social Law and Policy
TL;DR: In this paper, the origins of an open method of coordination are discussed, and the case of the OMC SPSI is discussed, along with a discussion of the role of proceduralism in governance.
Journal ArticleDOI
From Balance to Conflict: A New Constitution for the EU
Mark Dawson,Floris de Witte +1 more
TL;DR: The authors argues that the post-crisis EU requires a quite different normative, institutional and juridical framework, which reproduces the social and political cleavages that underlie authority on the national level and that allow divisive political choices to be legitimised.
Book
Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice
TL;DR: The European Court of Justice as a political actor as discussed by the authors has been criticised for its alleged bias in recent labor cases, and the Court's duty to respect sensitive national interests has been questioned.