La revisión sistemática de literatura es un método sistemático para identificar, evaluar e interpretar el trabajo de académicos y profesionales en un campo elegido. Su propósito es identificar lagunas en el conocimiento y necesidades de investigación en un campo concreto. Las revisiones sistemáticas conforman una familia amplia de métodos y aproximaciones y resultan totalmente necesarias por el volumen tan enorme de producción científica en formato digital al que se tiene potencialmente acceso. Sin embargo, no es suficiente con adjetivar una revisión como sistemática. El objetivo de este artículo es presentar las diferentes fases que se deben llevar a cabo cuando se realiza una revisión sistemática. Se comienza con la introducción de los marcos metodológicos de referencia para la realización de revisiones sistemáticas, para, a continuación, profundizar en las fases de planificación, realización e informe de la revisión sistemática. De modo que todo artículo que lleve este marbete (revisión sistemática de literatura) además de cumplir unos principios metodológicos y de transparencia, permita que cualquier investigador pueda no solo confiar en las conclusiones derivadas del trabajo, sino evolucionar la revisión sistemática realizada para atacar el problema derivado de la obsolescencia y el continuo avance del conocimiento científico, en consonancia con el modelo de datos FAIR, es decir, que se cumplen con los principios de encontrabilidad, accesibilidad, interoperabilidad y reutilización. Este artículo se ha escrito en español y en inglés.

https://revistas.usal.es/index.php/eks/article/download/28600/27680

Desarrollo de estados de la cuestión robustos: Revisiones Sistemáticas de Literatura

Human Capital Creation: A Collective Psychological, Social, Organizational and Religious Perspective.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/01492063221082555

Bringing the Manager Back Into Management Scholarship

This special issue was developed to extend the boundaries of strategic leadership research, to help bridge the micro-macro divide regarding theories of strategic leadership, and to bring together theories that have emerged independently. In this introductory editorial, we provide an overview of the research on strategic leadership and emphasize the need for further integration of research from the organizational behavior, industrial and organizational psychology, organizational economics, behavioral strategy, and strategic management fields. We then introduce and summarize the eleven articles we accepted for this special issue by classifying them into two broad themes: (a) Chief executive officer (CEO) characteristics and (b) the dynamics of interactions among the CEO, the top management team, and the board. Finally, we propose recent theoretical and empirical foci for advancing strategic leadership research and offer a research agenda for future research highlighting several important research questions related to extending the dialogue among scholars across the different leadership and strategy domains. 

Extending the boundaries of strategic leadership research

A systematic literature review is a systematic method for identifying, evaluating, and interpreting the work of scholars and practitioners in a chosen field. Its purpose is to identify gaps in knowledge and research needs in a particular field. Systematic reviews form a broad family of methods and approaches and are made absolutely necessary by the enormous volume of scientific output in digital format that is potentially accessible. However, it is not enough to label a review as systematic. This article aims to present the different phases to be carried out when conducting a systematic review. It begins with introducing the methodological frameworks for conducting systematic reviews and then goes into the phases of planning, conducting, and reporting the systematic review. So that any article bearing this label (systematic literature review), in addition to complying with methodological and transparency principles, allows any researcher not only to trust the conclusions derived from the work but also to evolve the systematic review carried out to tackle the problem derived from the obsolescence and continuous advance of scientific knowledge, in line with the FAIR data model, i.e., it meets the principles of findability, accessibility, interoperability and reuse. This article has been written in English and Spanish.

Mark T. Bolinger

Papers

Experiments in Strategy Research: A Critical Review and Future Research Opportunities: