scispace - formally typeset
M

Martin Levesley

Researcher at University of Leeds

Publications -  96
Citations -  2216

Martin Levesley is an academic researcher from University of Leeds. The author has contributed to research in topics: Control theory & Actuator. The author has an hindex of 23, co-authored 94 publications receiving 2008 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Systematic review of outcome measures used in the evaluation of robot-assisted upper limb exercise in stroke.

TL;DR: Standard-ized rating identified that FM, kinematic measures, Action Research Arm Test, Wolf Motor Function Test, FIMTM, and ABILHAND have adequate measurement properties for use in RAET.
Journal ArticleDOI

Coordination of active steering, driveline, and braking for integrated vehicle dynamics control

TL;DR: An integrated vehicle dynamics control system which aims to improve vehicle handling and stability by coordinating active front steering (AFS) and dynamic stability control (DSC) subsystems is developed in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Control Strategy for Upper Limb Robotic Rehabilitation With a Dual Robot System

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe the development and use of the cooperative control scheme used by the intelligent pneumatic arm movement (iPAM) system to deliver safe, therapeutic treatment of the upper limb during voluntary reaching exercises.
Journal ArticleDOI

Control of ionic polymer metal composites

TL;DR: In this article, the actuator characteristics are examined through the unblocked maximum displacement and blocked force output of an ionic polymer metal composite actuator and the performance of the polymer is investigated when implementing an impedance controller (force/position control).
Journal ArticleDOI

Home-based Computer Assisted Arm Rehabilitation (hCAAR) robotic device for upper limb exercise after stroke: results of a feasibility study in home setting

TL;DR: The hCAAR feasibility study is the first clinical study of its kind reported in the current literature; in this study, 17 participants used the robotic device independently for eight weeks in their own homes with minimal supervision from healthcare professionals.