scispace - formally typeset
M

Michael I. Bennett

Researcher at University of Leeds

Publications -  290
Citations -  17312

Michael I. Bennett is an academic researcher from University of Leeds. The author has contributed to research in topics: Palliative care & Cancer pain. The author has an hindex of 52, co-authored 266 publications receiving 13680 citations. Previous affiliations of Michael I. Bennett include United Nations Industrial Development Organization & Lancaster University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Managing Cancer Pain at the End of Life with Multiple Strong Opioids: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study in Primary Care

TL;DR: It is suggested that prescribing behaviour, rather than patient factors, plays an important role in multiple opioid prescribing at the end of life; highlighting the need for training and education that goes beyond the well-recognised WHO approach for clinical practitioners.
Journal ArticleDOI

Self-management support at the end of life: patients’, carers’ and professionals’ perspectives on managing medicines

TL;DR: Self-management was identified as an ever-changing process enacted along a continuum of behaviours fluctuating from full to no engagement, led to a complex web of roles and behaviours, varying day by day, if not hour by hour.
Journal ArticleDOI

Implementing person-centred outcome measures in palliative care: An exploratory qualitative study using Normalisation Process Theory to understand processes and context:

TL;DR: Key questions are provided that are essential for those implementing and using outcome measures to consider in order to facilitate the integration of outcome measures into routine palliative care practice.
Journal ArticleDOI

Efficacy, tolerability and acceptability of oxycodone for cancer-related pain in adults: an updated Cochrane systematic review.

TL;DR: Oxycodone offers similar levels of pain relief and adverse events to other strong opioids, however, hallucinations occurred less with CR oxycodone than with CR morphine, but the quality of this evidence was very low, so this finding should be treated with utmost caution.