Prospective Cohort Study

Lincoln, Yvonna, and Egon Guba, "Postpositivism and the Naturalist Paradigm," pp. 14-46 in Yvonna Lincoln and Egon Guba, Naturalistic Inquiry . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1985.*

Secret History: Return of the Black Death Channel 4, 7-8pm In 1348 the Black Death swept through London, killing people within days of the appearance of their first symptoms. Exactly how many died, and why, has long been a mystery. This Secret History documentary follows experts as they pick through the evidence and reveal why the plague killed on such a scale. And they ask, what might be coming next?

Medscape

1. Introduction and Overview. 2. Detecting Influential Observations and Outliers. 3. Detecting and Assessing Collinearity. 4. Applications and Remedies. 5. Research Issues and Directions for Extensions. Bibliography. Author Index. Subject Index.

Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity

https://www.commed.vcu.edu/Chronic_Disease/2012/cochranrvwrschbias.pdf

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

Cancer pain is a common symptom experienced by patients, caused either by the disease or its treatment. Morphine remains the most effective and recommended treatment for cancer pain. However, cancer patients still do not receive appropriate management for their pain, and under-treatment is common. Lack of knowledge and negative attitudes towards cancer pain and analgesia among professionals, patients and family caregivers are reported as one of the most common barriers to effective cancer pain management (CPM). To systematically review research on the nature and impact of attitudes and knowledge towards CPM, a systematic literature search of 6 databases (the Cochrane library, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science and EMBASE) was undertaken in July 2018. Additionally, hand-searching of Google, Google Scholar and reference lists was conducted. The inclusion criteria were adult (18–65 years of age), studies which included attitudes and knowledge towards CPM, studies written in English, published literature only and cross-sectional design. Included studies were critically appraised by two researchers independently using the Joanna Briggs Institute Analytical Cross Sectional Studies Assessment (JBI-ACSSA). A total of 36 studies met the inclusion criteria. The main finding was that among professionals, patients, caregivers and the public there were similar attitudinal barriers to effective CPM. The most commonly cited barriers were fear of drug addiction, tolerance of medication and side effects of opioids. We also found differences between professional groups (physicians versus nurses) and between different countries based on their potential exposure to palliative care training and services. There are still barriers to effective CPM, which might result in unrelieved cancer pain. Therefore, more educational programmes and training for professionals on CPM are needed. Furthermore, patients, caregivers, and the public need more general awareness and adequate level of knowledge about CPM.

/pdf/managing-pain-in-people-with-cancer-a-systematic-review-of-573nzynfg6.pdf

Managing Pain in People with Cancer—a Systematic Review of the Attitudes and Knowledge of Professionals, Patients, Caregivers and Public

Background:Despite advances in treatment of pain in advanced cancer, it remains a major source of suffering with adverse effects on patients’ life quality. There is increasing understanding of its multi-dimensional nature and the variable responsiveness of medication to complex pain. Less clear is how patients and their caregivers respond to and manage pain complexity.Aim:To explore patients’ and carers’ experiences of advanced cancer pain and the processes that they engage in to manage pain.Design:Qualitative study employing face-to-face interviews at two time points and audio diaries. Data were analysed using grounded theory strategies.Setting/participants:Purposive sample of 21 advanced cancer patients and 16 carers from oncology outpatients in a tertiary cancer centre and a hospice.Results:Three distinct patterns of pain were discerned in patients’ accounts, distinguishable in terms of complexity, severity, transiency and degree of perceived control over pain. Pain was dynamic reflecting changes in th...

/pdf/patient-and-caregiver-perspectives-on-managing-pain-in-zvcbr8jwwk.pdf

Patient and caregiver perspectives on managing pain in advanced cancer: A qualitative longitudinal study.

In this paper we review the challenges facing the delivery of research in end-of-life care in the UK and internationally as health policies begin to focus on improving care. These include the problems of terminology in this field of enquiry and the lack of emphasis on clinical studies relating to the medical aspects of end-of-life care, including research into pain and other symptoms. Future priorities are discussed that include the pressing need to build research capacity, making better use of existing intelligence, and to progress in incremental steps as part of sustained programmes of research.

Delivering research in end-of-life care: problems, pitfalls and future priorities

Opioids are important in the management of pain in patients with cancer. Clinicians and patients are sometimes concerned about the effect of opioids on survival, which might decrease opioid prescription, compliance, and symptom control. We wanted to determine whether opioid analgesia was associated with shorter survival in adult patients with cancer. We systematically searched for studies that assessed the effect of regular systemic opioid analgesia on survival. We identified 526 unique records, with 20 articles meeting inclusion criteria. Thirteen end-of-life studies, including 11 very low-quality retrospective studies, did not find a consistent association between opioid analgesic treatment and survival; this evidence comes from low-quality studies, so should be interpreted with caution. Seven longer-term studies, including three randomised controlled trials and two prospective studies, were included. Six of these studies indicated that opioids were likely to be associated with a shorter survival. None of these studies were powered to assess the effect of opioids on survival as a primary endpoint. In view of this, no definitive conclusions can be made as to whether opioids affect survival in patients with cancer. These data suggest that while opioid analgesia does not affect survival at the end of life, in the context of longer-term treatment, higher-quality studies, with survival as a primary endpoint, are needed to confirm an independent association between opioid analgesia and shorter survival. An important limitation of research in this field is that the relationship between greater analgesic requirements and shorter survival may be mediated by painful progressive cancer.

/pdf/is-regular-systemic-opioid-analgesia-associated-with-shorter-5flolxrsm3.pdf

Is regular systemic opioid analgesia associated with shorter survival in adult patients with cancer? A systematic literature review.

Background The Medical Outcomes Study 36 Item Short-Form (SF-36) questionnaire is one of the most widely used measures of health related quality of life in medical research, including studies on pain-related conditions. Although scores in each of its eight domains rarely conform to a normal distribution, it is most widely analysed using simple parametric statistical techniques. Some have suggested a need for more complex or non-parametric analytical approaches, and this quandary faces researchers recurrently when using the SF-36. In this study of chronic pain, we compared results arising from the SF-36 between three study sub-samples, using conventional parametric, non-parametric, bootstrapping and log transforming methods. Methods Respondents to a postal survey conducted in Aberdeen, Leeds and London (n = 3002, response rate 52%) were categorized in three groups according to previously validated questionnaires: those with chronic pain of predominantly neuropathic origin (POPNO, n = 241), those with chronic pain (non-POPNO, n = 1179), and those with no chronic pain (n = 1537). SF-36 scores were compared between these groups, using: ANOVA and t-tests; Kruskall–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U-tests; bootstrapping methods; and log transformation with ANOVA. Results There were highly significant differences between the three groups, with lower scores in all SF-36 domains found those with chronic pain (P < 0.001). Those with chronic POPNO had lower scores in all domains than those with chronic pain (non-POPNO) (P < 0.001). These results were the same after applying each statistical method Conclusions In this study, the choice of statistical approach had no influence on the results. We conclude that the conventional approach, using straightforward parametric tests, is both simplest and the best for allowing comparison with other studies. We are likely to adopt this in future studies.

Michael I. Bennett

Papers

Managing Pain in People with Cancer—a Systematic Review of the Attitudes and Knowledge of Professionals, Patients, Caregivers and Public

Patient and caregiver perspectives on managing pain in advanced cancer: A qualitative longitudinal study.

Delivering research in end-of-life care: problems, pitfalls and future priorities

Is regular systemic opioid analgesia associated with shorter survival in adult patients with cancer? A systematic literature review.

Analysing the SF-36 in population-based research. A comparison of methods of statistical approaches using chronic pain as an example.