scispace - formally typeset
M

Michael L. Nelson

Researcher at Old Dominion University

Publications -  430
Citations -  9042

Michael L. Nelson is an academic researcher from Old Dominion University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Web page & Digital library. The author has an hindex of 43, co-authored 388 publications receiving 8354 citations. Previous affiliations of Michael L. Nelson include Langley Research Center & University of Oklahoma.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the state of the DL domain after a decade of activity by applying social network analysis to the co-authorship network of the past ACM, IEEE, and joint ACM/IEEE digital library conferences.
BookDOI

Design concepts in nutritional epidemiology

TL;DR: Part A The scientific concepts underlying study design overview of the principles of nutritional Epidemiology design, planning and evaluation of nutritional epidemiological studies sampling, study size and power covariate measurement errors in nutritional epidemiology - effects and remedies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Between- and within-subject variation in nutrient intake from infancy to old age: estimating the number of days required to rank dietary intakes with desired precision.

TL;DR: Data from six studies were analyzed to estimate the number of recording days necessary for energy, 28 nutrients, and the ratio of polyunsaturated to saturated fatty acids.
Journal ArticleDOI

Food photography II: use of food photographs for estimating portion size and the nutrient content of meals

TL;DR: It is concluded that photographs depicting a range of portion sizes are a useful aid to the estimation of portion size, as well as the error associated with conceptualization and the nutrient content of meals when using photographs to estimate food portion size.
Journal ArticleDOI

Food photography I: the perception of food portion size from photographs

TL;DR: It is concluded that use of a series of eight photographs is associated with relatively small errors in portion size perception, whereas use of an average photograph is consistently associated with substantial underestimation across a variety of foods.