The quest for alternative drugs to the well-known cisplatin and its derivatives, which are still used in more than 50% of the treatment regimes for patients suffering from cancer, is highly needed.1,2 Despite their tremendous success, these platinum compounds suffer from two main disadvantages: they are inefficient against platinum-resistant tumors, and they have severe side effects such as nephrotoxicity. The latter drawback is the consequence of the fact that the ultimate target of these drugs is ubiquitous: It is generally accepted that Pt anticancer drugs target DNA, which is present in all cells.3,4 Furthermore, as a consequence of its particular chemical structure, cisplatin in particular offers little possibility for rational improvements to increase its tumor specificity and thereby reduce undesired side effects.

In this context, organometallic compounds, which are defined as metal complexes containing at least one direct, covalent metal−carbon bond, have recently been found to be promising anticancer drug candidates. Organometallics have a great structural variety (ranging from linear to octahedral and even beyond), have far more diverse stereochemistry than organic compounds (for an octahedral complex with six different ligands, 30 stereoisomers exist!), and by rational ligand design, provide control over key kinetic properties (such as hydrolysis rate of ligands). Furthermore, they are kinetically stable, usually uncharged, and relatively lipophilic and their metal atom is in a low oxidation state. Because of these fundamental differences compared to “classical coordination metal complexes”, organometallics offer ample opportunities in the design of novel classes of medicinal compounds, potentially with new metal-specific modes of action. Interestingly, all the typical classes of organometallics such as metallocenes, half-sandwich, carbene-, CO-, or π-ligands, which have been widely used for catalysis or biosensing purposes, have now also found application in medicinal chemistry (see Figure ​Figure11 for an overview of these typical classes of organometallics).



Figure 1

Summary of the typical classes of organometallic compounds used in medicinal chemistry.



In this Perspective, we report on the recent advances in the discovery of organometallics with proven antiproliferative activity. We are emphasizing those compounds where efforts have been made to identify their molecular target and mode of action by biochemical or cell biology studies. This Perspective covers more classes of compounds and in more detail than a recent tutorial review by Hartinger and Dyson.(5) Furthermore, whereas recent reviews and book contributions attest to the rapid development of bioorganometallic chemistry in general,6,7 this Perspective focuses on their potential application as anticancer chemotherapeutics. Another very recent review article categorizes inorganic anticancer drug candidates by their modes of action.(8) It should be mentioned that a full description of all currently investigated types of compounds is hardly possible anymore in a concise review. For example, a particularly promising class of organometallic anticancer compounds, namely, radiolabeled organometallics, has been omitted for space limitations. Recent developments of such compounds have been reviewed in detail by Alberto.(9)

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/jm100020w

Organometallic Anticancer Compounds

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/cr400460s

Metallodrugs in Medicinal Inorganic Chemistry

https://stuff.mit.edu/afs/athena/course/5/5.062/oldwww/Fall03/591.pdf

New metal complexes as potential therapeutics.

Cancer is rapidly becoming the top killer in the world. Most of the FDA approved anticancer drugs are organic molecules, while metallodrugs are very scarce. The advent of the first metal based therapeutic agent, cisplatin, launched a new era in the application of transition metal complexes for therapeutic design. Due to their unique and versatile biochemical properties, ruthenium-based compounds have emerged as promising anti-cancer agents that serve as alternatives to cisplatin and its derivertives. Ruthenium(iii) complexes have successfully been used in clinical research and their mechanisms of anticancer action have been reported in large volumes over the past few decades. Ruthenium(ii) complexes have also attracted significant attention as anticancer candidates; however, only a few of them have been reported comprehensively. In this review, we discuss the development of ruthenium(ii) complexes as anticancer candidates and biocatalysts, including arene ruthenium complexes, polypyridyl ruthenium complexes, and ruthenium nanomaterial complexes. This review focuses on the likely mechanisms of action of ruthenium(ii)-based anticancer drugs and the relationship between their chemical structures and biological properties. This review also highlights the catalytic activity and the photoinduced activation of ruthenium(ii) complexes, their targeted delivery, and their activity in nanomaterial systems.

/pdf/the-development-of-anticancer-ruthenium-ii-complexes-from-35e09q82ra.pdf

The development of anticancer ruthenium(II) complexes: from single molecule compounds to nanomaterials

The antitumor activity of the organometallic ruthenium(II)−arene complexes, RuCl2(η6-arene)(PTA), (arene = p-cymene, toluene, benzene, benzo-15-crown-5, 1-ethylbenzene-2,3-dimethylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate, ethyl benzoate, hexamethylbenzene; PTA = 1,3,5-triaza-7-phosphaadamantane), abbreviated RAPTA, has been evaluated. In vitro biological experiments demonstrate that these compounds are active toward the TS/A mouse adenocarcinoma cancer cell line whereas cytotoxicity on the HBL-100 human mammary (nontumor) cell line was not observed at concentrations up to 0.3 mM, which indicates selectivity of these ruthenium(II)−arene complexes to cancer cells. Analogues of the RAPTA compounds, in which the PTA ligand is methylated, have also been prepared, and these prove to be cytotoxic toward both cell lines. RAPTA-C and the benzene analogue RAPTA-B were selected for in vivo experiments to evaluate their anticancer and antimetastatic activity. The results show that these complexes can reduce the growth of lung m...

In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation of Ruthenium(II)−Arene PTA Complexes

Inhibition of the growth of the human ovarian cancer cell line A2780 by organometallic ruthenium(II) complexes of the type [(eta(6)-arene)Ru(X)(Y)(Z)], where arene is benzene or substituted benzene, X, Y, and Z are halide, acetonitrile, or isonicotinamide, or X,Y is ethylenediamine (en) or N-ethylethylenediamine, has been investigated. The X-ray crystal structures of the complexes [(eta(6)-p-cymene)Ru(en)Cl]PF(6) (5), [(eta(6)-p-cymene)RuCl(2)(isonicotinamide)] (7), and [(eta(6)-biphenyl)Ru(en)Cl]PF(6) (9) are reported. They have "piano stool" geometries with eta(6) coordination of the arene ligand. Complexes with X,Y as a chelated en ligand and Z as a monofunctional leaving group had the highest activity. Complexes 5, 6 (the iodo analogue of 5), 9, and 10 (ethylethylenediamine analogue of 9) were as active as carboplatin. Hydrolysis of the reactive Ru-Cl bond in complex 5 was detected by HPLC but was suppressed by the addition of chloride ions. Complex 5 binds strongly and selectively to G bases on DNA oligonucleotides to form monofunctional adducts. No inhibition of topoisomerase I or II by complexes 5, 6, or 9 was detected. These chelated Ru(II) arene complexes have potential as novel metal-based anticancer agents with a mechanism of action different from that of the Ru(III) complex currently on clinical trial.

Inhibition of cancer cell growth by ruthenium(II) arene complexes

Ruthenium complexes offer the potential of reduced toxicity, a novel mechanism of action, non-cross resistance and a different spectrum of activity compared to platinum containing compounds. Thirteen novel ruthenium(II) organometallic arene complexes have been evaluated for activity (in vitro and in vivo) in models of human ovarian cancer, and cross-resistance profiles established in cisplatin and multi-drug-resistant variants. A broad range of IC50 values was obtained (0.5 to >100 μM) in A2780 parental cells with two compounds (RM175 and HC29) equipotent to carboplatin (6 μM), and the most active compound (HC11) equipotent to cisplatin (0.6 μM). Stable bi-dentate chelating ligands (ethylenediamine), a more hydrophobic arene ligand (tetrahydroanthracene) and a single ligand exchange centre (chloride) were associated with increased activity. None of the six active ruthenium(II) compounds were cross-resistant in the A2780cis cell line, demonstrated to be 10-fold resistant to cisplatin/carboplatin by a mechanism involving, at least in part, silencing of MLH1 protein expression via methylation. Varying degrees of cross-resistance were observed in the P-170 glycoprotein overexpressing multi-drug-resistant cell line 2780AD that could be reversed by co-treatment with verapamil. In vivo activity was established with RM175 in the A2780 xenograft together with non-cross-resistance in the A2780cis xenograft and a lack of activity in the 2780AD xenograft. High activity coupled to non cross-resistance in cisplatin resistant models merit further development of this novel group of anticancer compounds.

/pdf/in-vitro-and-in-vivo-activity-and-cross-resistance-profiles-3bjvpf1vg9.pdf

In vitro and in vivo activity and cross resistance profiles of novel ruthenium (II) organometallic arene complexes in human ovarian cancer.

We have investigated the recognition of nucleic acid derivatives by organometallic ruthenium(II) arene anticancer complexes of the type [(η6-arene)Ru(II)(en)X] where en = ethylenediamine, arene = biphenyl (Bip), tetrahydroanthracene (THA), dihydroanthracene (DHA), p-cymene (Cym) or benzene (Ben), X = Cl- or H2O using 1H, 31P and 15N (15N-en) NMR spectroscopy. For mononucleosides, {(η6-Bip)Ru(en)}2+ binds only to N7 of guanosine, to N7 and N1 of inosine, and to N3 of thymidine. Binding to N3 of cytidine was weak, and almost no binding to adenosine was observed. The reactivity of the various binding sites of nucleobases toward Ru at neutral pH decreased in the order G(N7) > I(N7) > I(N1), T(N3) > C(N3) > A(N7), A(N1). Therefore, pseudo-octahedral diamino Ru(II) arene complexes are much more highly discriminatory between G and A bases than square-planar Pt(II) complexes. Such site-selectivity appears to be controlled by the en NH2 groups, which H-bond with exocyclic oxygens but are nonbonding and repulsive t...

Highly selective binding of organometallic ruthenium ethylenediamine complexes to nucleic acids: novel recognition mechanisms.

Compounds which may be used in the treatment and/or prevention of cancer have the formula (I) wherein: R , R , R , R , R and R independently represents H, alkyl, -CO2R', aryl or akylaryl, which latter two groups are optionally substituted on the aromatic ring; R' represent alkyl, aryl or alkaryl; X is halo, H2O, (R')(R'')SO, R'CO2 or (R')(R'')C=O, where R'' represents alkyl, aryl or alkaryl; Y is a counterion; m is 0 or 1; q is 1, 2 or 3; C' is C1 to C12 alkylene, optionally substituted in or on the alkylene chain, bound to two A groups; p is 0 or 1 and r is 1 when p is 0 and r is 2 when p is 1; and A and B are: each independently N-donor nitrile ligands; or B is halo and A is an N-donor pyridine ligand, optionally substituted at one or more of the carbon atoms of the pyridine ring; or p is 0, A is NR R and B is NR R , wherein R , R , R and R independently represent H or alkyl, and A and B are linked by an alkylene chain, optionally substituted in or on the alkylene chain; or p is 1, A is NR and B is NR R , wherein R , R and R are as previously defined, and A and B are linked by an alkylene chain, optionally substituted.

Half-sandwich ruthenium (ii) compounds comprising nitrogen containing ligands for treatment of cancer

Compounds which may be used in the treatment and/or prevention of cancer have the formula (I): wherein R?1 and R2? together with the ring to which they are bound represent a saturated or unsaturated carbocyclic or heterocyclic group.

Morris Robert Edward

Papers

Inhibition of cancer cell growth by ruthenium(II) arene complexes

In vitro and in vivo activity and cross resistance profiles of novel ruthenium (II) organometallic arene complexes in human ovarian cancer.

Highly selective binding of organometallic ruthenium ethylenediamine complexes to nucleic acids: novel recognition mechanisms.

Half-sandwich ruthenium (ii) compounds comprising nitrogen containing ligands for treatment of cancer

Ruthenium (ii) compounds for use in the therapy of cancer