scispace - formally typeset
N

Nathan Eva

Researcher at Monash University

Publications -  38
Citations -  2065

Nathan Eva is an academic researcher from Monash University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Servant leadership & Job performance. The author has an hindex of 14, co-authored 34 publications receiving 946 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research.

TL;DR: In this article, an integrative and comprehensive review of the 285 articles on servant leadership spanning 20 years (1998-2018) is presented. But, a lack of coherence and clarity around the construct has impeded its theory development.
Journal ArticleDOI

Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature

TL;DR: In this article, a systematic review of the psychological safety literature is presented, highlighting the need to advance our understanding of psychological safety through the integration of key theoretical perspectives to explain how psychological safety develops and influences work outcomes at different levels of analysis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Servant Leadership and Follower Job Performance: The Mediating Effect of Public Service Motivation

TL;DR: Li et al. as mentioned in this paper argued that by emphasizing to their followers the importance of serving others both inside and outside the organization and by acting as role models by serving others themselves, servant leaders enhance job performance by engendering higher public service motivation in their followers.
Journal ArticleDOI

SLBS-6: Validation of a Short Form of the Servant Leadership Behavior Scale

TL;DR: A 6-item short form of the original 35-item Servant Leadership Behavior Scale, a widely used measure of servant leadership behavior, has been validated in this article, which can be used with confidence for research and training purposes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Addressing common method variance and endogeneity in vocational behavior research:A review of the literature and suggestions for future research

TL;DR: In this article, a systematic literature review of study designs particularly prone to common method variance (CMV) and endogeneity, and of procedural and statistical remedies used in the field of vocational behavior is presented.