scispace - formally typeset
N

Neil Messenger

Researcher at University of Leeds

Publications -  28
Citations -  522

Neil Messenger is an academic researcher from University of Leeds. The author has contributed to research in topics: Coronal plane & Gait. The author has an hindex of 10, co-authored 27 publications receiving 461 citations. Previous affiliations of Neil Messenger include University of Brighton & University of Salford.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Forefoot, rearfoot and shank coupling: effect of variations in speed and mode of gait.

TL;DR: Kinematic coupling between the forefoot, rearfoot and shank was weak during walking relative to running, which implies the two motions are not rigidly linked, as has been assumed in previous injury models.
Journal ArticleDOI

Changes in foot and lower limb coupling due to systematic variations in step width.

TL;DR: The strong coupling of forefoot sagittal and transverse plane motions with rearfoot frontal plane motion suggests that forefoot motion exerts an important influence on subtalar joint kinematics.
Journal ArticleDOI

Kinematics of cycling in relation to anterior knee pain and patellar tendinitis

TL;DR: The coronal and sagittal plane leg movements of 24 experienced male cyclists were assessed using video analysis while cycling on a Kingcycle windload simulator to support the potential injury mechanism proposed by Francis (1986), which had previously only been examined using coronal plane kinematics.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sequential therapy of anti-Nogo-A antibody treatment and treadmill training leads to cumulative improvements after spinal cord injury in rats.

TL;DR: The results demonstrate that sequential administration of anti‐Nogo‐A antibody followed in time with intensive locomotor training leads to superior recovery of lost locomotor functions, which is probably mediated by changes in the interaction between descending sprouting and local segmental networks after SCI.
Journal ArticleDOI

Energetics of paraplegic walking

TL;DR: It was found that orthotically aided walking for paraplegics was slow and energy costly compared with both normal walking and wheelchair propulsion and, as it additionally requires the use of a walking aid in both hands, cannot be considered to confer the functional benefits frequently claimed for it.