Summary 1. The efficiency of agricultural subsidy programmes for preserving biodiversity and improving the environment has been questioned in recent years. Organic farming operates without pesticides, herbicides and inorganic fertilizers, and usually with a more diverse crop rotation. It has been suggested that this system enhances biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. We analysed the effects of organic farming on species richness and abundance using meta-analysis of literature published before December 2002. 2. Organic farming usually increases species richness, having on average 30% higher species richness than conventional farming systems. However, the results were variable among studies, and 16% of them actually showed a negative effect of organic farming on species richness. We therefore divided the data into different organism groups and according to the spatial scale of the study. 3. Birds, insects and plants usually showed an increased species richness in organic farming systems. However, the number of studies was low in most organism groups (range 2‐19) and there was significant heterogeneity between studies. The effect of organic farming was largest in studies performed at the plot scale. In studies at the farm scale, when organic and conventional farms were matched according to landscape structure, the effect was significant but highly heterogeneous. 4. On average, organisms were 50% more abundant in organic farming systems, but the results were highly variable between studies and organism groups. Birds, predatory insects, soil organisms and plants responded positively to organic farming, while non-predatory insects and pests did not. The positive effects of organic farming on abundance were prominent at the plot and field scales, but not for farms in matched landscapes. 5. Synthesis and applications. Our results show that organic farming often has positive effects on species richness and abundance, but that its effects are likely to differ between organism groups and landscapes. We suggest that positive effects of organic farming on species richness can be expected in intensively managed agricultural landscapes, but not in small-scale landscapes comprising many other biotopes as well as agricultural fields. Measures to preserve and enhance biodiversity should be more landscape- and farmspecific than is presently the case.

/pdf/the-effects-of-organic-agriculture-on-biodiversity-and-4ix2550nps.pdf

The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: a meta-analysis

Mycoinsecticides and Mycoacaricides: A comprehensive list with worldwide coverage and international classification of formulation types ☆

Insect pathogens as biological control agents: Back to the future.

▪ Abstract Control of grasshoppers and locusts has traditionally relied on synthetic insecticides, and for emergency situations this is unlikely to change. However, a growing awareness of the environmental issues associated with acridid control as well as the high costs of emergency control are expanding the demand for biological control. In particular, preventive, integrated control strategies with early interventions will reduce the financial and environmental costs associated with large-scale plague treatments. The recent development of effective oil formulations of Metarhizium anisopliae spores in Africa, Australia, and Brazil opens new possibilities for environmentally safe control operations. Metarhizium biopesticide kills 70%–90% of treated locusts within 14–20 days, with no measurable impact on nontarget organisms. An integrated pest management strategy, with an emphasis on the use of Metarhizium, that incorporates rational use of chemical pesticides with biological options such as the microsporid...

http://www.thethomaslab.net/uploads/lomer2001.pdf

Biological control of locusts and grasshoppers

Over half of the European landscape is under agricultural management and has been for millennia. Many species and ecosystems of conservation concern in Europe depend on agricultural management and are showing ongoing declines. Agri-environment schemes (AES) are designed partly to address this. They are a major source of nature conservation funding within the European Union (EU) and the highest conservation expenditure in Europe. We reviewed the structure of current AES across Europe. Since a 2003 review questioned the overall effectiveness of AES for biodiversity, there has been a plethora of case studies and meta-analyses examining their effectiveness. Most syntheses demonstrate general increases in farmland biodiversity in response to AES, with the size of the effect depending on the structure and management of the surrounding landscape. This is important in the light of successive EU enlargement and ongoing reforms of AES. We examined the change in effect size over time by merging the data sets of 3 recent meta-analyses and found that schemes implemented after revision of the EU's agri-environmental programs in 2007 were not more effective than schemes implemented before revision. Furthermore, schemes aimed at areas out of production (such as field margins and hedgerows) are more effective at enhancing species richness than those aimed at productive areas (such as arable crops or grasslands). Outstanding research questions include whether AES enhance ecosystem services, whether they are more effective in agriculturally marginal areas than in intensively farmed areas, whether they are more or less cost-effective for farmland biodiversity than protected areas, and how much their effectiveness is influenced by farmer training and advice? The general lesson from the European experience is that AES can be effective for conserving wildlife on farmland, but they are expensive and need to be carefully designed and targeted.

/pdf/the-role-of-agri-environment-schemes-in-conservation-and-3ngj15rjs9.pdf

The role of agri-environment schemes in conservation and environmental management

The Order Insecta contains nearly one million described species (May 2000) which comprise approximately 67% of the world’s described fauna and flora. Insects are central to the performance of many ecosystem processes. However, it is in their role as herbivores that conflicts arise with agricultural production due to direct consumption of cultivated crops and indirect damage by plant virus transmission or spoilage of potential yield. Natural enemies such as predators, parasitic wasps and flies, as well as pathogens have long been studied for exploitation in biological control and integrated pest management (IPM) strategies. For the purposes of this review, we will concentrate on examples of work with entomopathogenic fungi, which illustrate the principles or strategies which can be used to reduce losses by insect pests.

Entomopathogenic fungi as biological control agents.

1 Studies of the epigeal coleopteran fauna on five pairs of organic and conventional farms were carried out between May and July 1994 in southern England using pitfall trapping. A total of 27 749 individuals and 140 species were identified. Overall, abundance of Coleoptera was greatest on organically managed farms.



2 Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and staphylinid beetles (Col. Staphylinidae) formed 79.7% and 16.7%, respectively, of the total catch. Pterostichus melanarius was the dominant carabid among the 45 species captured and significantly higher numbers were found in organic farms. Tachinus signatus was the most common of 44 staphylinid species, and was significantly more abundant on conventional farms.



3 For carabids, the log-series α diversity index was higher on conventional farms but was not statistically different from that calculated for organic farms. The α index was identical for staphylinid species from organic and conventional farms. Diversity was significantly higher from conventional farms when data were combined for all of the recorded coleopteran species.



4 From this study, it appears that the main effect of farming practice is to influence the overall abundance and dominance of particular species, and the lower diversity of organic farms is a consequence of the large increase in dominance of a single species, namely P. melanarius.

Diversity and abundance of the coleopteran fauna from organic and conventional management systems in southern England

Conidia of Metarhizium flavoviride grown in diphasic culture with sporulation on rice, were extracted in kerosene and formulated with peanut oil. The formulation led to high mortality when applied to field populations of Zonocerus variegatus; between 70 and 95% of insects in samples collected from the field 0, 3 or 7 days after spraying died. Sporulation of M. flavoviride was observed in 70–80% of the dead‐treated insects, which compares favourably with results obtained in laboratory bioassays. Many dead Z. variegatus, some with internal sporulation, were found in shaded niches and oviposition sites in the treated plots. No sporulation was observed in samples collected prior to application, and both sporulation and mortality differed significantly between control and treated plots. Some infections were observed in insects collected 16 and 23 days after treatment; these late infections may be a consequence of contact with spores surviving in the environment.

Field Infection of Zonocerus variegatus following application of an oil‐based formulation of Metarhizium flavoviride conidia

Assessment of aphid host range and isolate variability in Pandora neoaphidis (Zygomycetes: Entomophthorales)

An oil-based formulation of Metarhizium flavoviride conidia, applied at 2 1012 spores ha-1 in 1 l ha-1 gave good control of Zonocerus variegatus in 1-ha plots in southern Benin. In a three-replicate, randomized, complete block (RCB) trial in Mono province, a significant reduction in insect counts between treated and control plots was observed 10-15 days after application; treatment reduced the population by about 90%. A four-replicate RCB trial in Oue me province also gave high mortality. Although a significant difference between treated and untreated plots was observed 10-18 days after application, insect dispersal out of cassava fields towards oviposition sites interfered with a clear demonstration of control. Significantly more Z. variegatus cadavers with M. flavoviride infection were found in treated plots than control plots.

P. A. Shah

Papers

Entomopathogenic fungi as biological control agents.

Diversity and abundance of the coleopteran fauna from organic and conventional management systems in southern England

Field Infection of Zonocerus variegatus following application of an oil‐based formulation of Metarhizium flavoviride conidia

Assessment of aphid host range and isolate variability in Pandora neoaphidis (Zygomycetes: Entomophthorales)

Control of Zonocerus variegatus by Ultra-low Volume Application of an Oil Formulation of Metarhizium flavoviride Conidia