scispace - formally typeset
P

Paul P. Wang

Researcher at Duke University

Publications -  70
Citations -  2256

Paul P. Wang is an academic researcher from Duke University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Fuzzy logic & Fuzzy number. The author has an hindex of 17, co-authored 70 publications receiving 2170 citations. Previous affiliations of Paul P. Wang include Indian Statistical Institute & Canon Inc..

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Advances to Bayesian network inference for generating causal networks from observational biological data

TL;DR: A novel influence score for DBNs is developed that attempts to estimate both the sign (activation or repression) and relative magnitude of interactions among variables and reduces a significant portion of false positive interactions in the recovered networks.
Book

Genetic Algorithms for Pattern Recognition

TL;DR: Genetic Algorithms for Pattern Recognition covers a broad range of applications in science and technology, describing the integration of genetic algorithms in pattern recognition and machine learning problems to build intelligent recognition systems.
Book ChapterDOI

Fuzzy Sets: Theory of Applications to Policy Analysis and Information Systems

TL;DR: This volume presents a spectrum of original research works ranging from the very basic properties and characteristics of fuzzy sets to specific areas of applications in the fields of policy analysis and information systems.
Journal ArticleDOI

Fuzzy relation equations (I): the general and specialized solving algorithms

TL;DR: It is shown that a polynomial time algorithm to find all minimal solutions for a general system of fuzzy relation equations simply does not exist with expectation of P=NP, so the problem of solving fuzzy relation equation is an NP-hard problem in terms of computational complexity.
Journal ArticleDOI

The lower and upper approximations in a fuzzy group

TL;DR: This paper first points out that there are still some incomplete theorems in [11] although some authors have showed several incorrect statements in the literature, and presents the improved versions of the incomplete propositions.