P
Paul P. Wang
Researcher at Duke University
Publications - 70
Citations - 2256
Paul P. Wang is an academic researcher from Duke University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Fuzzy logic & Fuzzy number. The author has an hindex of 17, co-authored 70 publications receiving 2170 citations. Previous affiliations of Paul P. Wang include Indian Statistical Institute & Canon Inc..
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Advances to Bayesian network inference for generating causal networks from observational biological data
TL;DR: A novel influence score for DBNs is developed that attempts to estimate both the sign (activation or repression) and relative magnitude of interactions among variables and reduces a significant portion of false positive interactions in the recovered networks.
Book
Genetic Algorithms for Pattern Recognition
Sankar K. Pal,Paul P. Wang +1 more
TL;DR: Genetic Algorithms for Pattern Recognition covers a broad range of applications in science and technology, describing the integration of genetic algorithms in pattern recognition and machine learning problems to build intelligent recognition systems.
Book ChapterDOI
Fuzzy Sets: Theory of Applications to Policy Analysis and Information Systems
Paul P. Wang,Shining Chang +1 more
TL;DR: This volume presents a spectrum of original research works ranging from the very basic properties and characteristics of fuzzy sets to specific areas of applications in the fields of policy analysis and information systems.
Journal ArticleDOI
Fuzzy relation equations (I): the general and specialized solving algorithms
Li Chen,Paul P. Wang +1 more
TL;DR: It is shown that a polynomial time algorithm to find all minimal solutions for a general system of fuzzy relation equations simply does not exist with expectation of P=NP, so the problem of solving fuzzy relation equation is an NP-hard problem in terms of computational complexity.
Journal ArticleDOI
The lower and upper approximations in a fuzzy group
Nobuaki Kuroki,Paul P. Wang +1 more
TL;DR: This paper first points out that there are still some incomplete theorems in [11] although some authors have showed several incorrect statements in the literature, and presents the improved versions of the incomplete propositions.