P
Peter A. Glassman
Researcher at University of California, Los Angeles
Publications - 112
Citations - 5625
Peter A. Glassman is an academic researcher from University of California, Los Angeles. The author has contributed to research in topics: Veterans Affairs & Health care. The author has an hindex of 31, co-authored 102 publications receiving 5234 citations. Previous affiliations of Peter A. Glassman include West Los Angeles College & RAND Corporation.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: A Prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality
TL;DR: Vignettes appear to be a valid and comprehensive method that directly focuses on the process of care provided in actual clinical practice and show promise as an inexpensive case-mix adjusted method for measuring the quality of care given by a group of physicians.
Journal ArticleDOI
Measuring the quality of physician practice by using clinical vignettes: A prospective validation study
John W. Peabody,Jeff Luck,Peter A. Glassman,Sharad Jain,Joyce Hansen,Maureen Spell,Martin Lee +6 more
TL;DR: A measurement tool that overcomes limitations and measures physicians' clinical practice against a predefined set of explicit quality criteria is developed, and the validity of standardized patients as a gold standard is demonstrated by concealing audio recorders on standardized patients during visits.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Implications of Choice: Prescribing Generic or Preferred Pharmaceuticals Improves Medication Adherence for Chronic Conditions
William H. Shrank,Tuyen Hoang,Susan L. Ettner,Peter A. Glassman,Kavita V. Nair,Dee DeLapp,June Dirstine,Jerry Avorn,Steven M. Asch +8 more
TL;DR: In 3-tier pharmacy benefit plans, prescribing generic or preferred medications within a therapeutic class is associated with improvements in adherence to therapy.
Journal ArticleDOI
How well does chart abstraction measure quality? A prospective comparison of standardized patients with the medical record.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compared chart abstraction with standardized-patient reports for four aspects of the encounter: taking the history, examining the patient, making the diagnosis, and prescribing appropriate treatment.
Journal ArticleDOI
Improving recognition of drug interactions: benefits and barriers to using automated drug alerts.
TL;DR: Automated drug interaction alerts have the potential to dramatically increase clinicians’ recognition of selected drug interactions, however, perceived poor specificity of drug alerts may be an important obstacle to efficient utilization of information and may impede the ability of such alerts to improve patient safety.