scispace - formally typeset
P

Phillip Atiba Goff

Researcher at John Jay College of Criminal Justice

Publications -  10
Citations -  249

Phillip Atiba Goff is an academic researcher from John Jay College of Criminal Justice. The author has contributed to research in topics: Justice (ethics) & Social psychology (sociology). The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 10 publications receiving 140 citations. Previous affiliations of Phillip Atiba Goff include University of California, Los Angeles.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The criminogenic and psychological effects of police stops on adolescent black and Latino boys

TL;DR: It is found that adolescent boys who are stopped by police report more frequent engagement in delinquent behavior 6, 12, and 18 months later, independent of prior delinquency, a finding that is consistent with labeling and life course theories.
Journal ArticleDOI

The psychological science of racial bias and policing.

TL;DR: The authors identified the following situations common to patrol policing as risk factors that make bias more likely to result in discrimination: discretion, novice status, crime focus, cognitive demand, and identity threats.
Journal ArticleDOI

The mismeasure of Terry stops: Assessing the psychological and emotional harms of stop and frisk to individuals and communities

TL;DR: It is argued that the failure to grapple with the application of modern knowledge to modern policing practices leads to a mismeasurement on both sides of the Terry equation, which causes stop and frisk to cause a wide range of emotional and psychological harms.
Journal ArticleDOI

Policing alienated minorities in divided cities

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined three factors to explain minority-majority disparities in views of the police: (i) police effectiveness and fairness; (ii) intergroup discrimination (termed relative deprivation in policing); and (iii) identification with the state.
Journal ArticleDOI

Implications of research staff demographics for psychological science.

TL;DR: How research staff demographics might influence research findings through (a) ingroup versus outgroup effects, (b) stereotype and (implicit) bias effects, and (c) priming and social tuning effects is discussed.