scispace - formally typeset
P

Piero Stanig

Researcher at Bocconi University

Publications -  25
Citations -  1184

Piero Stanig is an academic researcher from Bocconi University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Globalization & Shock (economics). The author has an hindex of 10, co-authored 23 publications receiving 778 citations. Previous affiliations of Piero Stanig include London School of Economics and Political Science & Hertie School of Governance.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The trade origins of economic nationalism: import competition and voting behavior in Western Europe

TL;DR: In this article, the impact of globalization on electoral outcomes in 15 Western European countries over 1988-2007 was investigated, using both official election results at the district level and individual level.
Journal ArticleDOI

Global Competition and Brexit

TL;DR: The authors showed that support for the Leave option in the Brexit referendum was systematically higher in regions hit harder by economic globalization, and that the effect is driven by the displacement determined by globalization in the absence of effective compensation of its losers.
Journal ArticleDOI

Church-state separation and redistribution

TL;DR: The authors argue that organized religion makes it possible for the rich and the religious poor to form electoral coalitions in favor of low taxes and limited redistribution, and they occur at the expense of the secular poor.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Surge of Economic Nationalism in Western Europe

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss how economic shocks contribute to explaining the rise of economic nationalist and radical right parties in western Europe between the early 1990s and 2016, looking in turn at theory and evidence on the political effects of globalization, technological change, the financial and sovereign debt crises of 2008-2009 and 2011-2013.
Journal ArticleDOI

Political polarization in retrospective economic evaluations during recessions and recoveries

TL;DR: The authors found that during economic downturns, citizens of different ideological persuasions and partisan affiliations tend to agree that the state of the economy is dire, while during recoveries, evaluations are polarized along partisan and ideological lines.