Rachel E. Thorman

TL;DR: McAllister et al. as mentioned in this paper reviewed the current understanding of how manure management influences direct and indirect N 2 O emissions and CH 4 emissions, introduce new data comparing direct N 2O emissions following spreading of a range of manure types by different methods, and highlight some of the mitigations being considered by researchers and policy makers in developed and developing countries.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used N2O chamber data collected from multiple field experiments across different geo-climatic zones in the UK and from a range of nitrogen treatments to quantify uncertainties associated with flux measurements.

TL;DR: Cardenas et al. as discussed by the authors quantified annual N2O emission fluxes from grazed grassland under a range of inorganic fertiliser nitrogen inputs and found that the fluxes varied with the amount of fertilizer used.

TL;DR: A trial was conducted consisting of 14 experiments across sites in England of contrasting soil type and annual rainfall to assess the effectiveness of nitrification inhibitors (predominantly dicyandiamide (DCD) but limited assessment also of 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) and a commercial product containing two pyrazole derivatives) in reducing direct nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from fertilizer nitrogen (N), cattle urine and cattle slurry applications to land.

TL;DR: Regression analysis suggests that urine N2O EFs were controlled more by composition than was the case for dung, whilst dung N2 o emission factors were more related to soil and environmental factors.