Secret History: Return of the Black Death Channel 4, 7-8pm In 1348 the Black Death swept through London, killing people within days of the appearance of their first symptoms. Exactly how many died, and why, has long been a mystery. This Secret History documentary follows experts as they pick through the evidence and reveal why the plague killed on such a scale. And they ask, what might be coming next?

Medscape

https://www.medpagetoday.com/upload/2011/4/4/Clin%20Infect%20Dis.-2002-O'Grady-1281-307.pdf

Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-related Infections

https://www.medpagetoday.com/upload/2008/3/6/CRC.pdf

Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology.

Naomi P. O'Grady, M.D., Mary Alexander, R.N. Lillian A. Burns, M.T., M.P.H., C.I.C. E. Patchen Dellinger, M.D. Jeffery Garland, M.D., S.M. Stephen O. Heard, M.D. Pamela A. Lipsett, M.D. Henry Masur, M.D. Leonard A. Mermel, D.O., Sc.M. Michele L. Pearson, M.D. Issam I. Raad, M.D. Adrienne Randolph, M.D., M.Sc. Mark E. Rupp, M.D. Sanjay Saint, M.D., M.P.H. and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC).

/pdf/guidelines-for-the-prevention-of-intravascular-catheter-4xarsoczlz.pdf

Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections, 2011

Cost Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.

Building a Better Compliance Officer

PurposeUsing national surveys, we longitudinally studied imaging costs—and specifically those paid out-of-pocket (OOP) by patients—over two decades.MethodsUsing 2000 to 2019 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data, we identified all imaging-focused encounters (mammography, radiography, ultrasonography, and CT and MR [surveyed together in Medical Expenditure Panel Survey]) and calculated mean overall and OOP encounter costs. Effects of sociodemographic, personal, and clinical factors were measured using logistic regression and generalized linear modeling.ResultsWe identified 102,717 patients (mean 45.6 years; 64.8% female; 58.8% White) undergoing 229,010 imaging-focused encounters. Between 2000 and 2019, mean costs of mammography, radiography, and ultrasonography increased 14.5%, 24.5%, and 40% and total mean cost of CT or MR decreased by 15.1%. OOP costs were incurred by 51%. Overall mean OOP costs increased 89.8% from 2000 to 2019. Mean OOP costs for mammography decreased by 32.9%; mean OOP costs for radiography, ultrasonography, and CT or MR increased 81%, 123.2%, and 61%, respectively. Patients were less likely to incur OOP costs when older, of racial and ethnic minorities, female, or recipients of public only (versus private) insurance. Among those with OOP costs, the presence of comorbidities, lack of insurance, younger age, and history of cancer significantly increased OOP costs.ConclusionMean overall patient OOP costs for imaging examinations increased significantly and substantially over the last two decades. Lack of insurance, younger age, history of cancer, and other comorbidities were associated with higher OOP costs. As diagnostic imaging utilization increases, patient financial hardship considerations merit further attention. 

Out-of-Pocket Expenditures for Imaging Examinations: Perspectives from National Patient Surveys Over Two Decades.

Purpose The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) provides CMS flexibility to evaluate radiologists using hospital outpatient quality measures in place of conventional physician measures. We explore radiologist characteristics associated with variation in performance in two such measures: abdomen and chest CT “double scan” rates (percentage of total examinations performed both with and without intravenous contrast). Methods Radiologists’ claims for abdomen and chest CT examinations in a facility setting were identified using 2014 Medicare Physician and Other Supplier data. Individual radiologist double scan rates were computed. Associations were explored between rates and radiologist characteristics extracted from the CMS public data sets using multivariable regression with cross-validation. Results Radiologists’ double scan rates averaged 5.9% ± 10.0% (0.0% for 52.8% of radiologists) for abdomen CT (19,867 radiologists) and 1.0% ± 4.7% (0.0% for 91.3% of radiologists) for chest CT (18,684). At multivariable analysis, abdomen rates were best predicted by geography (lowest in Northeast, greatest in West), practice size (greatest for small practices), and specialty practice pattern (lowest for general radiologists; greatest for nuclear medicine physicians). Agreement for double scan rates among radiologists within the same practice was moderate, though slightly higher for chest (intraclass correlation = 0.70) than abdomen (0.59). Conclusion Radiologists’ facility double scan rates vary systematically based on an array of professional characteristics. MACRA grants CMS the authority to use these measures for evaluating radiologists, thereby aligning Medicare’s hospital and physician performance programs and better incentivizing population radiation dose and cost reduction. Greater variation in abdomen CT double scan rates, compared with ubiquitously excellent chest CT performance, supports a particular role for abdomen rates in distinguishing disparities in radiologist performance.

Double Scan CT Rates: An Opportunity for Facility-Based Radiologist Measures in the Quality Payment Program

Dictating for dollars (and compliance, too).

SUMMARY: Using the Medicare Physician-Supplier Procedure Summary Master File, we evaluated the evolving use of fMRI in Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries from 2007 through 2017. Annual use rates (per 1,000,000 enrollees) increased from 17.7 to 32.8 through 2014 and have remained static since. Radiologists have remained the dominant specialty group from 2007 to 2017 (86.4% and 88.6% of all services, respectively), and the outpatient setting has remained the dominant place of service (65.4% and 65.4%, respectively).

Richard Duszak

Papers

Building a Better Compliance Officer

Out-of-Pocket Expenditures for Imaging Examinations: Perspectives from National Patient Surveys Over Two Decades.

Double Scan CT Rates: An Opportunity for Facility-Based Radiologist Measures in the Quality Payment Program

Dictating for dollars (and compliance, too).

Evolving Use of fMRI in Medicare Beneficiaries.