Since their isolation in the early 1990s, members of the Hedgehog family of intercellular signaling proteins have come to be recognized as key mediators of many fundamental processes in embryonic development. Their activities are central to the growth, patterning, and morphogenesis of many different regions within the body plans of vertebrates and insects, and most likely other invertebrates. In some contexts, Hedgehog signals act as morphogens in the dose-dependent induction of distinct cell fates within a target field, in others as mitogens regulating cell proliferation or as inducing factors controlling the form of a developing organ. These diverse functions of Hedgehog proteins raise many intriguing questions about their mode of operation. How do these proteins move between or across fields of cells? How are their activities modulated and transduced? What are their intracellular targets? In this article we review some well-established paradigms of Hedgehog function inDrosophila and vertebrate development and survey the current understanding of the synthesis, modification, and transduction of Hedgehog proteins. Embryological studies over much of the last century that relied primarily on the physical manipulation of cells within the developing embryo or fragments of the embryo in culture, provided many compelling examples for the primacy of cell–cell interactions in regulating invertebrate and vertebrate development. The subsequent identification of many of the signaling factors that mediate cellular communication has led to two general conclusions. First, although there are many important signals, most of these fall into a few large families of secreted peptide factors: theWnt (Wodarz and Nusse 1998), fibroblast growth factor (Szebenyi and Fallon 1999), TGFsuperfamily (Massague and Chen 2000), plateletderived growth factor (Betsholtz et al. 2001), ephrin (Bruckner and Klein 1998), and Hedgehog families. Second, parallel studies in invertebrate and vertebrate systems have shown that although the final outcome might look quite different (e.g., a fly vs. a mouse), there is a striking conservation in the deployment of members of the same signaling families to regulate development of these seemingly quite different organisms. This review focuses on one of the most intriguing examples of this phenomenon, that of the Hedgehog family. As with many of the advances in our understanding of the genetic regulation of animal development, hedgehog (hh) genes owe their discovery to the pioneering work of Nusslein-Volhard and Wieschaus (1980). In their screen for mutations that disrupt the Drosophila larval body plan, these authors identified several that cause the duplication of denticles (spiky cuticular processes that decorate the anterior half of each body segment) and an accompanying loss of naked cuticle, characteristic of the posterior half of each segment (see Fig. 1). The ensuing appearance of a continuous lawn of denticles projecting from the larval cuticle evidently suggested the spines of a hedgehog to the discoverers, hence the origin of the name of one of these genes. Other loci identified by mutants with this phenotype included armadillo, gooseberry, and wingless (wg). In contrast, animals mutant for the aptly named naked gene showed the converse phenotype, with denticle belts replaced by naked cuticle in every segment. On the basis of these mutant phenotypes, Nusslein-Volhard and Wieschaus (1980) proposed that these so-called segment-polarity genes regulate pattern within each of the segments of the larval body, individual genes acting within distinct subregions of the emerging segmental pattern. The first important breakthrough in unraveling how segment-polarity genes act came in the mid-1980s with the cloning of two members of the class, wingless and engrailed (en). Wg was shown to be the ortholog of the vertebrate proto-oncogene int1 (subsequently renamed Wnt1 and the founder member of the Wnt family of secreted peptide factors; Rijsewijk et al. 1987), whereas the sequence of en revealed that it encodes a homeodomaincontaining transcription factor (Fjose et al. 1985; Poole et al. 1985). Intriguingly, the two genes were found to be expressed in adjacent narrow stripes of cells in each segment (Martinez Arias et al. 1988). A close spatial relationship between Wnt1 and En expression domains was also reported in the primordial midbrain and hindbrain of the vertebrate embryo (McMahon et al. 1992). AnalyWe dedicate this review to the memory of our dear friend and colleague Rosa Beddington, whose encouragement led to our initial collaboration. 3Corresponding authors. E-MAIL p.w.ingham@sheffield.ac.uk; FAX 0114-222-288. E-MAIL amcmahon@biosun.harvard.edu; FAX (617) 496-3763. Article and publication are at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/ gad.938601.

/pdf/hedgehog-signaling-in-animal-development-paradigms-and-39bv1i8k90.pdf

Hedgehog signaling in animal development: paradigms and principles.

http://www.jbc.org/content/254/19/9933.full.pdf

Laminin--a glycoprotein from basement membranes.

Tumour cells traverse epithelial and endothelial basement membranes during the successive stages of the metastatic process. At the transition from in situ to invasive carcinoma, local dissolution of the basement membrane is observed microscopically1,2, and coincides with tumour cell invasion of the underlying stroma. Tumour cells further traverse the endothelial basement membrane during entry into and egress from blood vessels3–5. Electron microscopic studies have shown local dissolution of basement membrane at its area of contact with invading tumour cells, suggesting an enzymatic mechanism3,6,7. Basement membranes are resilient structures which present a mechanical barrier to invasion8. Type IV collagen is a major structural protein of basement membranes and is chemically and genetically distinct from stroma collagen types I and III and cartilage collagen type II9,10. Previously characterised animal collagenases which cleave collagen types I; II and III fail to degrade type IV collagen11,12. We have recently purified about 1,000-fold and characterised a neutral protease activity preferential for type IV collagen from metastatic tumour cells and shown that it (1) produces specific degradation products, (2) has a molecular weight of 65,000, (3) is not plasmin or a cathepsin, by pH and inhibitor studies, and (4) does not significantly degrade other collagens or fibronectin12,13. Here we extend the relevance of this finding by quantitating the ability of several murine tumour cell lines of known metastatic potential to degrade type IV collagen. The cell lines with the highest incidence of spontaneous metastasis exhibit the greatest level of type IV collagen-degrading activity in two different assays using either living cells or media obtained from cell cultures.

Metastatic potential correlates with enzymatic degradation of basement membrane collagen.

In recent years, the basement membrane (BM)--a specialized form of extracellular matrix (ECM)--has been recognized as an important regulator of cell behaviour, rather than just a structural feature of tissues. The BM mediates tissue compartmentalization and sends signals to epithelial cells about the external microenvironment. The BM is also an important structural and functional component of blood vessels, constituting an extracellular microenvironment sensor for endothelial cells and pericytes. Vascular BM components have recently been found to be involved in the regulation of tumour angiogenesis, making them attractive candidate targets for potential cancer therapies.

Basement membranes: structure, assembly and role in tumour angiogenesis

We have studied the reconstitution of basement membrane molecules from extracts prepared from the basement membrane of the EHS tumor. Under physiological conditions and in the presence of added type IV collagen and heparan sulfate proteoglycan, gellike structures form whose ultrastructure appears as interconnected thin sheets resembling the lamina dense zone of basement membrane. The major components of the reconstituted structures include laminin, type IV collagen, heparan sulfate proteoglycan, entactin, and nidogen. These components polymerize in constant proportions on reconstitution, suggesting that they interact in defined proportions. Molecular sieve studies on the soluble extract demonstrate that laminin, entactin, and nidogen are associated in large but dissociable complexes which may be a necessary intermediate in the deposition of basement membrane. The reconstituted matrix was biologically active and stimulated the growth and differentiation of certain cells.

Basement Membrane Complexes with Biological Activity

We have studied a murine tumor previously classified as a poorly differentiated chondrosarcoma. Although the cells in this tumor are surrounded by large quantities of extracellular matrix material, the matrix fails to react with stains specific for the sulfated glycosaminoglycans present in normal cartilage. Here we show at the ultrastructural level that the tumor matrix is a homogeneous, nonfibrillar material, resembling basement membrane. Neither the proteoglycan matrix granules nor collagen fibrils characteristic of cartilage are present in the tumor matrix. Amino acid analyses of whole tumor tissue, enzyme-solubilized tumor components, and the protein extracted from lathyritic tumors confirmed that the tumor matrix is a basement membrane collagen. The collagenous protein extracted from the tumor by nonenzymatic means contains three unique polypeptides larger than the alpha-chain components of the other types of collagen. These studies indicate that the tumor is not a type of chondrosarcoma but a basement membrane producing tumor.

/pdf/a-murine-tumor-producing-a-matrix-of-basement-membrane-9cmcs8yrzz.pdf

A murine tumor producing a matrix of basement membrane

Isolation of rat aortic endothelial cells by primary explant techniques and their phenotypic modulation by defined substrata.

Undersulfated chondroitin sulfate in the cartilage matrix of brachymorphic mice.

Stage-specific effects of sonic hedgehog expression in the epidermis.

In this work we have undertaken a comparative study of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and human saphenous vein endothelial cells (HSVECs) with respect to functional and antigenic tissue factor (TF), tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), and TF mRNA. Monolayers of each cell type (passage 2, except where specified) were grown to confluence and then activated for 4 h with either 50 U/mL IL-1-α or 10 μg/mL tumor necrosis factor-α. Activated factor X appearing in supernatant was measured using a chromogenic assay, and both Northern blots and quantitative RT-PCR were performed to assess concentrations of TF mRNA accompanying activation. The role of TFPI was separately determined by ELISA for supernatant TFPI antigen, and by measurements of production of activated factor X in the presence of 0, 5, 15, or 50 μg/mL of an antibody directed against TFPI. To address a non-TF pathway endothelial cell function, antigenic concentrations of tissue plasminogen activator for both cell types was also determined by ELISA. HUVECs were found to produce 2.4- to 3.5-fold more functional TF. No significant HUVEC-HSVEC differences were detected in TF antigen, supernatant TFPI, anti-TFPI affinity for endothelial cell-associated TFPI, TF mRNA or its amplification products, and tissue plasminogen activator. Immunostaining for TF antigen, however, may have failed to detect a modest HUVEC-HSVEC difference. Our finding with respect to functional TF indicates that HUVECs and HSVECs are not equivalent in terms of models for endothelial cell function in small children versus adults.

/pdf/comparison-of-tissue-factor-pathway-in-human-umbilical-vein-3rl7ugt8g6.pdf

Comparison of tissue factor pathway in human umbilical vein and adult saphenous vein endothelial cells: implications for newborn hemostasis and for laboratory models of endothelial cell function.

Roslyn W. Orkin

Papers

A murine tumor producing a matrix of basement membrane

Isolation of rat aortic endothelial cells by primary explant techniques and their phenotypic modulation by defined substrata.

Undersulfated chondroitin sulfate in the cartilage matrix of brachymorphic mice.

Stage-specific effects of sonic hedgehog expression in the epidermis.

Comparison of tissue factor pathway in human umbilical vein and adult saphenous vein endothelial cells: implications for newborn hemostasis and for laboratory models of endothelial cell function.