scispace - formally typeset
R

Ruth Bevan

Researcher at Cranfield University

Publications -  17
Citations -  889

Ruth Bevan is an academic researcher from Cranfield University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Occupational cancer & Population. The author has an hindex of 11, co-authored 17 publications receiving 778 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Occupation and cancer in Britain.

TL;DR: This project is the first to quantify in detail the burden of cancer and mortality due to occupation specifically for Britain and highlights the impact of occupational exposures, together with the occupational circumstances and industrial areas where exposures to carcinogenic agents occurred in the past, on population cancer morbidity and mortality.
Journal ArticleDOI

Occupational cancer burden in Great Britain

TL;DR: This article outlines the structure of the supplement – two methodological papers (statistical approach and exposure assessment), eight papers presenting the cancer-specific results grouped by broad anatomical site, a paper giving industry sector results and one discussing work-related cancer-prevention strategies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sources of Variability in Biomarker Concentrations

TL;DR: This review provides an overview of factors that might influence inter- and intraindividual variation in biomarker concentrations apart from external exposure magnitude and helps researchers in improving the design and interpretation of biomonitoring studies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Inter- and intra-individual variation in urinary biomarker concentrations over a 6-day sampling period. Part 2: personal care product ingredients.

TL;DR: An intensive study to provide data on intra- and inter-individual variation in urinary excretion of a series of ingredients in personal care products and bisphenol A to provide insight into the design and interpretation of urinary biomonitoring studies for non-persistent chemicals.
Journal ArticleDOI

Reference ranges for key biomarkers of chemical exposure within the UK population

TL;DR: It is shown that large investigations may not be necessary to get a reasonable idea of environmental exposures, especially in initial 'screening-type' investigations to identify particular exposures of concern or to demonstrate that exposures are reassuring low and that no further survey data needs to be gathered.