S
Saeid Safiri
Researcher at Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
Publications - 388
Citations - 49522
Saeid Safiri is an academic researcher from Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Mortality rate. The author has an hindex of 40, co-authored 376 publications receiving 32616 citations. Previous affiliations of Saeid Safiri include Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Health Services & University of Tabriz.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Blood pressure and all-cause mortality by level of cognitive function in the elderly: Results from a population-based study in rural Greece: Methodological issues.
TL;DR: The results suggested that among brachial blood pressure components there is a significant association between mean arterial pressure and systolic blood pressure with allcause mortality among individuals with cognitive impairment.
Journal ArticleDOI
Prognostic Value of Computed Tomography: Measured Parameters of Body Composition in Primary Operable Gastrointestinal Cancers: Methodologic Issues.
Erfan Ayubi,Saeid Safiri +1 more
TL;DR: Univariate analysis indicated that body composition did not predict survival for the OG cancer patients, but among the CR cancer Patients, survival was shorter for those with sarcopenia or low levels of subcutaneous fat, and the PH assumption has been violated.
Journal ArticleDOI
Relationship between parental hypertension and cardiometabolic risk factors in adolescents: Methodological issues.
TL;DR: A takehome message for the readers is that multivariate model building should be done in the standard way; otherwise, the adjusted associations are confounded by uncontrolled confounding variables.
Journal ArticleDOI
Letter to the Editor. Methodological issues with the development of a prediction rule for diagnosing postoperative meningitis.
Saeid Safiri,Erfan Ayubi +1 more
TL;DR: The model developed by Hernández Ortiz and colleagues improves diagnostic accuracy in neurosurgical patients suspected of infection and should be interpreted with caution as it employed a cross-sectional study.