According to W. Edwards Deming, American companies require nothing less than a transformation of management style and of governmental relations with industry. In Out of the Crisis, originally published in 1982, Deming offers a theory of management based on his famous 14 Points for Management. Management's failure to plan for the future, he claims, brings about loss of market, which brings about loss of jobs. Management must be judged not only by the quarterly dividend, but by innovative plans to stay in business, protect investment, ensure future dividends, and provide more jobs through improved product and service. In simple, direct language, he explains the principles of management transformation and how to apply them.

Out of the Crisis

Conditioned Reflexes; an Investigation of the Physiological Activity of the Cerebral Cortex.

The Leadership Challenge: How to Keep Getting Extraordinary Things Done in Organizations

Resolving Social Conflicts: Selected Papers on Group Dynamics. Kurt Lewin

The increasing intelligence of products and systems, their intra-company cross-linking and their cross-company integration into value creation networks is referred to as Industry 4.0. Academics and practitioners, largely agreeing on the global importance of this proclaimed industrial revolution, have published many contributions on the topic. Research, however, is rather focused on investigating single technologies in quite specific application domains and largely neglects the profound managerial challenges underlying Industry 4.0. Given the recent plea for a more active contribution from the management science community, we strive to establish Industry 4.0 as a challenging but promising field for management research, and aim to assist scholars in engaging with the topic. Therefore, we first gather and analyze extant contributions by means of a systematic literature review and synthesize the information gained into 18 managerial challenges of Industry 4.0 falling into six interrelated clusters: (1) strategy and analysis, (2) planning and implementation, (3) cooperation and networks, (4) business models, (5) human resources and (6) change and leadership. Considering that Industry 4.0 is still an emerging topic and publications may therefore not always be found in highly ranked journals, we aimed to increase the confidence in our findings and triangulated our data by conducting an online survey of industry experts and academics that allows us to qualify the identified challenges in terms of importance and future research need. On this basis, we present an empirically backed research agenda and suggest fruitful avenues for future research in three basic categories: practice-enhancing research, knowledge-enhancing research, and high-impact research.

Managerial challenges of Industry 4.0: an empirically backed research agenda for a nascent field

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to contribute a roadmap to the change management literature, and provide definitions for describing change types, change enablers and change methods. This paper also proposes aligning the change type with the change method to find the effect on the change outcomes. New researchers can use this paper to get an overview of the change management discipline along with the main concepts that help in understanding the different dimensions of and relationships between the change types and methods in the literature. Managers can use this paper to describe and classify their organizational change situation and select an implementation method for systematic change and for change management. Design/methodology/approach – This framework is designed based on literature review and experts judgment. Findings – The results of the research propose a hypothesis that describes the relationships between the change types and methods and how this relationship can affect the change outcome...

Integrating the organizational change literature: a model for successful change

The goal of this research article is to examine the relationships between the research variables change-management actions, change readiness, and systematic change. Change management is defined by three factors: leadership, project management, and learning. Change readiness is defined by two factors: knowledge and resources. Systematic change is defined by one factor of carefully sequenced actions that align customers, products/services, processes/tools, structure, and skill mix. This framework is operationalized and applied using a survey of participants in a high-tech organization's transformation. The results show that as change-management actions increases or decreases, there is an increase or decrease in change readiness, which supports systematic change. Managers can use the findings to assess the effectiveness of their change actions, change readiness in their organizations, and outcomes of their systematic change efforts. Managers can also use the findings to define their specific change-managemen...

Serina Al-Haddad

Papers

Integrating the organizational change literature: a model for successful change

Assessing The Factors Enabling Systematic Change