S
Shulan Lu
Researcher at Texas A&M University–Commerce
Publications - 30
Citations - 857
Shulan Lu is an academic researcher from Texas A&M University–Commerce. The author has contributed to research in topics: Cognition & Eye tracking. The author has an hindex of 7, co-authored 29 publications receiving 759 citations. Previous affiliations of Shulan Lu include Texas A&M University & University of Memphis.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
AutoTutor: a tutor with dialogue in natural language.
Arthur C. Graesser,Shulan Lu,G. T. Jackson,Heather H. Mitchell,Mathew Ventura,Andrew Olney,Max M. Louwerse +6 more
TL;DR: The design was inspired by explanation-based constructivist theories of learning, intelligent tutoring systems that adaptively respond to student knowledge, and empirical research on dialogue patterns in tutorial discourse.
Journal ArticleDOI
Question asking and eye tracking during cognitive disequilibrium: comprehending illustrated texts on devices when the devices break down.
TL;DR: As was predicted, deep comprehenders asked better questions and fixated on device components that explained the malfunction and the occurrence and timing of convergence on faults, causal reasoning, and other cognitive processes were traced.
Journal ArticleDOI
Social Cues in Animated Conversational Agents
TL;DR: This article found that participants preferred natural agents with natural voices, as predicted by the social-cue hypothesis, although female agents with male voices formed an exception, this was explained by a stereotype effect.
Journal ArticleDOI
Embodied conversational agents as conversational partners
TL;DR: In this paper, eye tracking studies investigated how humans distribute eye gaze towards conversational agents in complex tutoring systems, finding that the agent receiving the most attention throughout the interaction, even when display size was statistically controlled.
Journal ArticleDOI
An Empirical and Computational Investigation of Perceiving and Remembering Event Temporal Relations
TL;DR: This work investigates the roles of these three types of event boundaries in constructing event temporal relations, and shows that people make use of the overlap between events and take into account the ends and beginnings, but they weight ends more than beginnings.