As the largest pool of terrestrial organic carbon, soils interact strongly with atmospheric composition, climate, and land cover change. Our capacity to predict and ameliorate the consequences of global change depends in part on a better understanding of the distributions and controls of soil organic carbon (SOC) and how vegetation change may affect SOC distributions with depth. The goals of this paper are (1) to examine the association of SOC content with climate and soil texture at different soil depths; (2) to test the hypothesis that vegetation type, through patterns of allocation, is a dominant control on the vertical distribution of SOC; and (3) to estimate global SOC storage to 3 m, including an analysis of the potential effects of vegetation change on soil carbon storage. We based our analysis on .2700 soil profiles in three global databases supplemented with data for climate, vegetation, and land use. The analysis focused on mineral soil layers. Plant functional types significantly affected the vertical distribution of SOC. The per- centage of SOC in the top 20 cm (relative to the first meter) averaged 33%, 42%, and 50% for shrublands, grasslands, and forests, respectively. In shrublands, the amount of SOC in the second and third meters was 77% of that in the first meter; in forests and grasslands, the totals were 56% and 43%, respectively. Globally, the relative distribution of SOC with depth had a slightly stronger association with vegetation than with climate, but the opposite was true for the absolute amount of SOC. Total SOC content increased with precipitation and clay content and decreased with temperature. The importance of these controls switched with depth, climate dominating in shallow layers and clay content dominating in deeper layers, possibly due to increasing percentages of slowly cycling SOC fractions at depth. To control for the effects of climate on vegetation, we grouped soils within climatic ranges and compared distributions for vegetation types within each range. The percentage of SOC in the top 20 cm relative to the first meter varied from 29% in cold arid shrublands to 57% in cold humid forests and, for a given climate, was always deepest in shrublands, inter- mediate in grasslands, and shallowest in forests ( P , 0.05 in all cases). The effect of vegetation type was more important than the direct effect of precipitation in this analysis. These data suggest that shoot/root allocations combined with vertical root distributions, affect the distribution of SOC with depth. Global SOC storage in the to p3mo fsoil was 2344 Pg C, or 56% more than the 1502 Pg estimated for the first meter (which is similar to the total SOC estimates of 1500-1600 Pg made by other researchers). Global totals for the second and third meters were 491 and 351 Pg C, and the biomes with the most SOC at 1-3 m depth were tropical evergreen forests (158 Pg C) and tropical grasslands/savannas (146 Pg C). Our work suggests that plant functional types, through differences in allocation, help to control SOC distributions with depth in the soil. Our analysis also highlights the potential importance of vegetation change and SOC pools for carbon sequestration strategies.

The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation

A general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional applications I. Hydrologic balance, canopy gas exchange and primary production processes

Current disturbance models do not adequately account for the wide range of responses by grassland plant communities to grazing by large generalist herbivores The evolutionary history of grazing, a

A Generalized Model of the Effects of Grazing by Large Herbivores on Grassland Community Structure

▪ Abstract Recent overviews have suggested that the relationship between species richness and productivity (rate of conversion of resources to biomass per unit area per unit time) is unimodal (hump-shaped). Most agree that productivity affects species richness at large scales, but unanimity is less regarding underlying mechanisms. Recent studies have examined the possibility that variation in species richness within communities may influence productivity, leading to an exploration of the relative effect of alterations in species number per se as contrasted to the addition of productive species. Reviews of the literature concerning deserts, boreal forests, tropical forests, lakes, and wetlands lead to the conclusion that extant data are insufficient to conclusively resolve the relationship between diversity and productivity, or that patterns are variable with mechanisms equally varied and complex. A more comprehensive survey of the ecological literature uncovered approximately 200 relationships, of which 3...

The Relationship Between Productivity and Species Richness

Interannual variability in aboveground net primary production (ANPP) was assessed with long-term (mean = 12 years) data from 11 Long Term Ecological Research sites across North America. The greatest interannual variability in ANPP occurred in grasslands and old fields, with forests the least variable. At a continental scale, ANPP was strongly correlated with annual precipitation. However, interannual variability in ANPP was not related to variability in precipitation. Instead, maximum variability in ANPP occurred in biomes where high potential growth rates of herbaceous vegetation were combined with moderate variability in precipitation. In the most dynamic biomes, ANPP responded more strongly to wet than to dry years. Recognition of the fourfold range in ANPP dynamics across biomes and of the factors that constrain this variability is critical for detecting the biotic impacts of global change phenomena.

/pdf/variation-among-biomes-in-temporal-dynamics-of-aboveground-10pcgjdhen.pdf

Variation Among Biomes in Temporal Dynamics of Aboveground Primary Production

The relationship between abovegound net primary production (ANPP) and water use varies significantly among ecosystem types. For both hot deserts and shortgrass prairie—cold deserts which are water limited, ANPP is linearly related to annual water use above minimum amount of water, estimated at 38 and 170 mm, respectively, needed annually to sustain each system. Once the minimum water too sustain ANPP is reached, ANPP increases an estimated 0.38 g and 1.09 g per 1000 g of additional water in the hot desert and the shortgrass prairie—cold desert. In forest systems not water stressed, ANPP was not related to water use. For grasslands representing a gradient from water stressed toward not water stressed, ANPP correspondingly declined per unit of water used. Classically evaluating water—use efficiency as annual ANPP divided by annual evapotranspiration, forests are the most efficient, 0.9 to 1.8 g ANPP/1000 g water, followed by shortgrass prairie, 0.2 to 0.7, then hot deserts, 0.1 to 0.3. See full-text article...

Primary Productivity and Water Use in Native Forest, Grassland, and Desert Ecosystems

This paper, a synthesis based on data generated by the International Biological Pro- gram, deals with the relationships among biotic and abiotic factors at the ecosystem level. Emphasis is placed on aboveground net primary production (ANPP), a major component of energy that drives ecosystem processes, and on potential evapotranspiration (PET), the abiotic variable most often used to explain variation in ANPP. The question addressed is: can ANPP be related to combinations of biotic and abiotic factors such that the relationships are independent of ecosystem type, whether it be forest, grassland, or desert'? ANPP as a function of peak foliar standing crop (FSC) was best explained by models which showed a reduction in ANPP/FSC as FSC increased. Thus, deserts had a higher ANPP per unit of FSC than did other systems. As expected, photosynthetic efficiency (PE) was highest for forests, -ZOO times greater than for deserts. However, when PE was evaluated per unit of foliage, the differences in PE of ecosystems were much less. In fact, a hot-desert site had the highest PE/FSC. In terms of a theoretical maximum, the PE of forests was only 6-25% of the maximum value. Systems with nearly steady-state aboveground standing crop (ASC) showed an exponential decrease with decreased water availability (potential evapotranspiration minus precipitation). For these same systems, the ratio of ANPP to ASC increased with decreased water availability, suggesting that water-stressed systems need more energy from ANPP to drive internal processes. A model predicting ANPP of desert-shortgrass steppes was structured in terms of FSC, water availability, and temperature. The predictive power was found to be very highs and the model was successfully validated in two of three cases with an independent data set. A model predicting ANPP of forests was structured in terms of FSC, radiation, ASC, and temperature. The deviation of the observed ANPP relative to that calculated was 17%. Deviations from predicted values were highest for deciduous stands with high ANPP and low FSC. Most relationships exhibited good correlations between ANPP and the various independent vari- ables including both biotic, abiotic, and combinations of the two. However, in many instances the data tended to be grouped by ecosystem type, suggesting that variation in ANPP can be reduced if ecosystem type is an added independent variable. It was surprising to find that, with the limits of our data, differences in ANPP at the ecosystem level are not glaring, especially considering that soil factors were not included in our analyses. When considering the broad range of genotypes in each ecosystem, and the much broader genotypic range representing all ecosystems, the control that native ecosystems have over abiotic factors in producing ANPP is evident but not large.

Primary production and abiotic controls in forests, grasslands, and desert ecosystems in the united states'

The relationship between aboveground net primary production (ANPP) and water use varies significantly among ecosystem types. For both hot deserts and shortgrass prairie-cold deserts which are water limited, ANPP is linearly related to annual water use above a minimum amount of water, estimated at 38 and 170 mm, respectively, needed annually to sustain each system. Once the minimum water to sustain ANPP is reached, ANPP increases an estimated 0.38 g and 1.09 g per 1000 g of additional water in the hot desert and the shortgrass prairie-cold desert. In forest systems not water stressed, ANPP was not related to water use. For grasslands representing a gradient from water stressed toward not water stressed, ANPP correspondingly declined per unit of water used. Classically evaluating water-use efficiency as annual ANPP divided by annual evapotranspiration, forests are the most efficient, 0.9 to 1.8 g ANPP/1000 g water, followed by shortgrass prairie, 0.2 to 0.7, then hot deserts, 0.1 to 0.3.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/info/1938237

Stan Szarek

Papers

Primary Productivity and Water Use in Native Forest, Grassland, and Desert Ecosystems

Primary production and abiotic controls in forests, grasslands, and desert ecosystems in the united states'

Native forest, grassland, and desert ecosystems1'2