This 1966 paperback edition of a publication which first appeared in 1963 has by now been widely reviewed as a worthy contribution to the sociological study of deviant behavior. Its current appearance as a paperback is a testimonial both to the quality of the work and to the prominence of deviant behavior in this generation. In general the author places deviance in perspective, identifies types of deviant behavior, considers the role of rule makers and enforcers, and some of the problems in studying deviance. In addition, he develops a sequential model of deviance relying on the concept of career, a concept originally developed in studies of occupations. In his study of a particular kind of deviance, the use of marihuana, the author posits and tests systematically an hypothesis about the genesis of marihuana use for pleasure. The hypothesis traces the sequence of changes in individual attitude

Outsiders Studies in the Sociology of Deviance.

INTRODUCTION The issue of social rehabilitation and reintegration (hereafter social reintegration2) is mentioned under the third strategy target of the EU Action Plan 2000–2004. The third EU strategy target is to 'substantially increase the number of successfully treated addicts', and point 3.1.3.4 instructs that 'Member States [are] to ensure that adequate attention is paid to social and professional rehabilitation and reintegration of former addicts'. However, social reintegration is also linked to social exclusion, which is mentioned in chapter 2 of the EU Action Plan, where it is stated that 'the EMCDDA [is] to develop indicators on drug-related crime, the availability of illicit drugs (including at street level) and drug-related social exclusion'. For the EMCDDA, social reintegration comes under strategy target four – that is, as a response to social exclusion – however, target two is clearly also relevant. Social exclusion is often perceived as a cause of problem drug use, although many see it as a consequence of problem drug use. We will not elaborate on this further here, except to note that social exclusion and problem drug use are two phenomena that are very closely interlinked and that social reintegration is a possible response to both. The EMCDDA Programme 2, 'Analysis of responses', set out to identify how social reintegration is understood in each Member State and to map the availability of social reintegration facilities in Member States according to these national perceptions. It became evident at an early stage that this would be a complex task, involving extensive data collection, as national reports generally provided insufficient data on this specific subject. eight countries turned out to be difficult to map and so, in February 2002, the EMCDDA launched a call for tender for a project, 'Mapping social reintegration services in EU countries'. 3 The aim of this project was to describe the state of the art of social reintegration in the following eight countries: The research specifications, to investigate 'the state of the art of social reintegration', suggested that the following should be identified for each of the eight countries: 1 Other contributors will be mentioned in the respective chapters. 2 Our country studies so far have shown that the term 'rehabilitation' is used ambiguously across Europe – from low-threshold refuges, to normal treatment, to actual reintegration into society. For this reason, we shall use the term 'social reintegration' in this report, as this is used much more …

European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction

Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change

The AUDIT Alcohol Consumption Questions (AUDIT-C) An Effective Brief Screening Test for Problem Drinking

Smoking prevalence is higher among disadvantaged groups, and disadvantaged smokers may face higher exposure to tobacco's harms. Uptake may also be higher among those with low socioeconomic status (SES), and quit attempts are less likely to be successful. Studies have suggested that this may be the result of reduced social support for quitting, low motivation to quit, stronger addiction to tobacco, increased likelihood of not completing courses of pharmacotherapy or behavioral support sessions, psychological differences such as lack of self-efficacy, and tobacco industry marketing. Evidence of interventions that work among lower socioeconomic groups is sparse. Raising the price of tobacco products appears to be the tobacco control intervention with the most potential to reduce health inequalities from tobacco. Targeted cessation programs and mass media interventions can also contribute to reducing inequalities. To tackle the high prevalence of smoking among disadvantaged groups, a combination of tobacco control measures is required, and these should be delivered in conjunction with wider attempts to address inequalities in health.

Socioeconomic status and smoking: a review

A future vaccination campaign against COVID-19 at risk of vaccine hesitancy and politicisation

Background: Although the use of cannabis among young people has become a major public health concern, there is no such test in France for general population surveys.Objective: This article aims to present a short screening test for cannabis abuse among adolescents and young adults in general population surveys, the CAST (Cannabis Abuse Screening Test) designed at the French Monitoring Center for Drug and Drug addictions (OFDT).Methods: The survey was conducted in France among 1728 scholars aged 14–22, in secondary schools, high schools, and university. After presenting internal consistency and factorial structure, the authors compared the CAST with the part of the POSIT (Problem‐Oriented Screening Instrument for Teenagers) dealing with alcohol and drug abuse among cannabis users in order to validate the optimal thresholds of the CAST for the high risk of abuse defined for the POSIT.Results: The CAST appears to be unidimensional and have high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha equals 0.81). Among canna...

Validation of the CAST, a general population Cannabis Abuse Screening Test

Aims This study aimed at increasing understanding of the relationship between sporting activities and alcohol, cigarette and cannabis use among adolescents, by examining gender, age and the context of sporting practice.

Design, setting, subjects The study was a national school survey (n = 10807; ages 14–19 years) conducted in France in 1999.

Measures Respondents were asked confidentially by self-administered questionnaire (pen and paper) about their use of licit and illicit drugs and life-style (including sporting activities outside school: hours per week, registration in a club, type of sport).

Findings The U-shaped curve between the intensity of physical activities and licit and illicit drug use appeared not to be systematic. It depended mainly on the product and the level of use. It only remained significant for boys and heavy smoking once gender and age effect were taken into account.

Conclusion The results stress the need to control for age and gender when the survey participants are teenagers. The relationship between drug use and sporting activity also depends on the type of sport.

Beyond the U-curve: the relationship between sport and alcohol, cigarette and cannabis use in adolescents.

Les donnees du Barometre sante 2005 presentees dans ce numero de Tendances permettent d'actualiser les niveaux d'usage des differentes substances licites et illicites ; l'examen par produit est l'occasion de documenter pour la premiere fois un certain nombre de questions inedites relatives a l'alcool et au cannabis.

Les niveaux d'usage des drogues en France en 2005

There is an ongoing debate in the survey research literature about whether and when probability and nonprobability sample surveys produce accurate estimates of a larger population. Statistical theory provides a justification for confidence in probability sampling as a function of the survey design, whereas inferences based on nonprobability sampling are entirely dependent on models for validity. This article reviews the current debate about probability and nonprobability sample surveys. We describe the conditions under which nonprobability sample surveys may provide accurate results in theory and discuss empirical evidence on which types of samples produce the highest accuracy in practice. From these theoretical and empirical considerations, we derive best-practice recommendations and outline paths for future research.

/pdf/a-review-of-conceptual-approaches-and-empirical-evidence-on-2lykwa4aq4.pdf

Stéphane Legleye

Papers

A future vaccination campaign against COVID-19 at risk of vaccine hesitancy and politicisation

Validation of the CAST, a general population Cannabis Abuse Screening Test

Beyond the U-curve: the relationship between sport and alcohol, cigarette and cannabis use in adolescents.

Les niveaux d'usage des drogues en France en 2005

A review of conceptual approaches and empirical evidence on probability and nonprobability sample survey research