scispace - formally typeset
S

Stephen R. Thomas

Researcher at University of Cincinnati

Publications -  103
Citations -  5612

Stephen R. Thomas is an academic researcher from University of Cincinnati. The author has contributed to research in topics: Maintenance of Certification & Certification. The author has an hindex of 32, co-authored 103 publications receiving 5256 citations. Previous affiliations of Stephen R. Thomas include Boston Children's Hospital & University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

MIRD Pamphlet No. 21: A Generalized Schema for Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry—Standardization of Nomenclature

TL;DR: The MIRD Committee objectives are to restate its schema for assessment of absorbed dose in a manner consistent with the needs of both the nuclear medicine and the radiation protection communities, and to formally adopt the dosimetry quantities equivalent dose and effective dose for use in comparative evaluations of potential risks of radiation-induced stochastic effects to patients after nuclear medicine procedures.
Journal Article

MIRD pamphlet no. 16: Techniques for quantitative radiopharmaceutical biodistribution data acquisition and analysis for use in human radiation dose estimates.

TL;DR: This report describes recommended techniques for radiopharmaceutical biodistribution data acquisition and analysis in human subjects to estimate radiation absorbed dose using the Medical Internal Radiation Dose (MIRD) schema.
Journal ArticleDOI

Relation between Effective Radiation Dose and Outcome of Radioiodine Therapy for Thyroid Cancer

TL;DR: Evaluated responses to therapeutic irradiation with 131I in 76 patients with thyroid adenocarcinoma found patients with metastases that persisted after 131I therapy tended to have more advanced disease and received significantly lower radiation doses per millicurie of administered 131I than did persons whose lesions responded to treatment.
Journal Article

Radioiodine-131 therapy for well-differentiated thyroid cancer--a quantitative radiation dosimetric approach: outcome and validation in 85 patients.

TL;DR: Success rates are equal to or better than those reported with empiric methods of 131I administration and the individualized treatment planning selectively allocates hospitalization and higher exposures to 131I to those patients who require them.