T
Thea Peetsma
Researcher at University of Amsterdam
Publications - 63
Citations - 2977
Thea Peetsma is an academic researcher from University of Amsterdam. The author has contributed to research in topics: Academic achievement & Goal orientation. The author has an hindex of 25, co-authored 61 publications receiving 2598 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
How to Improve Teaching Practices: The Role of Teacher Motivation, Organizational Factors, and Leadership Practices
TL;DR: This paper found that building schoolwide capacity for teacher learning will improve teaching practices, however, there is little systematic evidence to support this claim, and this study aimed to find the evidence for this claim.
Journal ArticleDOI
Effects of inclusion on students with and without special educational needs reviewed
Nienke Ruijs,Thea Peetsma +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, a review of the literature on the effects of inclusion on both students with and without special educational needs is described, which covers not only effects on cognitive development, but also socio-emotional effects.
Journal ArticleDOI
Child negative emotionality and parenting from infancy to preschool: a meta-analytic review.
TL;DR: Higher levels of child negative emotionality were associated with more restrictive control in samples with less than 75% 1st-born children, as well as in infants and preschoolers, and in studies using parent report or composite measures to assess bothnegative emotionality and restrictive parenting.
Journal ArticleDOI
Building school-wide capacity for improvement: the role of leadership, school organizational conditions, and teacher factors
TL;DR: The authors examined the extent to which school improvement capacity develops over time in a sample of elementary schools in The Netherlands and found that improving leadership may be an important first step in the process of building school-wide capacity.
Journal ArticleDOI
Inclusion in Education: Comparing pupils' development in special and regular education
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compared the development of matched pairs of primary-aged pupils in mainstream and special education over periods of 2 and 4 years and found that pupils in regular education had made more progress in academic performance than their matched pairs in special education.