T
Tim Shallice
Researcher at University College London
Publications - 293
Citations - 52506
Tim Shallice is an academic researcher from University College London. The author has contributed to research in topics: Cognition & Frontal lobe. The author has an hindex of 94, co-authored 291 publications receiving 50959 citations. Previous affiliations of Tim Shallice include University of London & University of Cambridge.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Fluency and rule breaking behaviour in the frontal cortex.
Lisa Cipolotti,Pascal Molenberghs,Juan Dominguez,Nicola Smith,Daniela Smirni,Tianbo Xu,Tim Shallice,Edgar Chan +7 more
TL;DR: DF may have limited utility as a tool in detecting lateralized frontal executive dysfunction, whereas FAS and rule break behavior appears to be linked to a set of well localized left frontal grey matter regions and white matter tracts.
Journal ArticleDOI
Impairments of auditory-verbal short-term memory: Do selective deficits of the input phonological buffer exist?
TL;DR: Whether the correspondence between the functional syndrome of auditory-verbal short-term storage impairment and a Baddeley-Hitch model component is still of value to memory theory is considered.
Journal ArticleDOI
Generation and recognition of abstract rules in different frontal lobe subgroups.
TL;DR: It is suggested that the Left Lateral frontal cortex is critical specifically for the generation of hypotheses in inductive reasoning.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Ulster depth interrogation techniques and their relation to sensory deprivation research
TL;DR: The psychophysiological methods used by the British in Ulster to precede depth interrogation are discussed in this paper, where it is argued that the rationale of the techniques, which was ignored by British Government reports, is to break the resistance of the internee by increasing anxiety in a positive feedback fashion.
Journal ArticleDOI
A left basal ganglia case of dynamic aphasia or impairment of extra-language cognitive processes?
TL;DR: The patient's impairments are interpreted as a consequence of an inability to generate verbal responses particularly in situations of high competition and involves the function of left frontal regions and the second deficit is one of impaired novel thought generation as evidenced by perseverations.